华枫论坛
第1页，共3页 1 23
在一页显示本主题中的 40 个帖子

华枫论坛 (http://www.chinasmile.net/forums/index.php)
-   视听发烧站 (http://www.chinasmile.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=62)
-   -   【测试】看看你得花多少钱，去满足你的耳朵 (http://www.chinasmile.net/forums/showthread.php?t=510783)

lighting May 30th, 2011 21:56
【测试】看看你得花多少钱，去满足你的耳朵
 
这个在线测试网站，不错！推荐给大家！以免大家烧糊涂，花了不需要的银子在器材上，或者你测了后才知道，原来你是金耳朵， 居然还不曾不敢在这里发帖！

还有我倒是觉得这也是测试器材的好手段，器材不行，耳朵再金，也听不出来了。

如果测试结果在12以下，那你只要能放大声的系统就可以了！

结果在12-24， 那你起码得有套1000刀的系统。

如果你能得到27以上的高分，那么恭喜你，你有一对金耳朵！上万的系统就是为你设计的！不知道这是坏事还是好事？:smile:

大家不要忘了报个成绩！

Link:

http://www.klippel.de/listeningtest/lt/

sthunter May 30th, 2011 22:55
-27dB

lighting May 30th, 2011 23:14
引用:
作者: sthunter (帖子 4192737)
-27dB
:32:

你能把你用的器材列一下吗？如果你的耳朵是-30db 的话，那么我们是不是可以说你这套器材可得-27db 的分数！

还有大家最好 PrintScreen 一下， 然后Paste 到 Windows 自带的 Paint 的程序里做个截屏， 以留纪念。

hugoo May 30th, 2011 23:18
-33dB
另外，向那7个-51dB:eek1:的金耳朵敬礼！

器材：
USB soundcard: RME Fireface UC
Pre-amp: SPL 2Control
Speaker: JBL6325P

http://i53.tinypic.com/wjxspl.jpg

sthunter May 31st, 2011 00:19
引用:
作者: lighting (帖子 4192760)
:32:

你能把你用的器材列一下吗？如果你的耳朵是-30db 的话，那么我们是不是可以说你这套器材可得-27db 的分数！

还有大家最好 PrintScreen 一下， 然后Paste 到 Windows 自带的 Paint 的程序里做个截屏， 以留纪念。
呵呵，是从手提电脑的喇叭发声，没用器材。

lighting May 31st, 2011 00:59
引用:
作者: sthunter (帖子 4192824)
呵呵，是从手提电脑的喇叭发声，没用器材。

所以你得 show 你的证书，以证明你的什么牌子的手提电脑的喇叭这么HIFI:smile:.

lighting May 31st, 2011 01:01
引用:
作者: hugoo (帖子 4192764)
-33dB
另外，向那7个-51dB:eek1:的金耳朵敬礼！
原先想给你吃点药降体温，没想吃了后烧得更高了，因为找到了发烧的理论依据:smile:。

hugoo May 31st, 2011 09:53
引用:
作者: lighting (帖子 4192864)
原先想给你吃点药降体温，没想吃了后烧得更高了，因为找到了发烧的理论依据:smile:。
我已经退烧啦 :belial:
就像下面这个家伙说的，我现在是anti-audiophile，只用pro-gear。 :belial:

I agree with most of your comments but I'd just like to say that I'm as anti-audiophile as you. In fact, I've become so disillusioned by the audiophile quest for what they perceive as nice - rather than accurate - sound that I listen almost exclusively these days to pro gear. Like you, I leave my high-end audiophile gear to gather dust.

I'm after accuracy, pure and simple, and dislike euphonic, laid-back, out-of-focus sound. I want to hear drums sound as explosive as they do in real-life, trumpets to have all the golden brassiness of the real thing, and the reproduced sound to convey a good proportion of the live experience. And pro gear does this in my experience considerably better than audiophile equipment calculated to please the sonic palates of audiophiles. And you're wrong in believing that audiophiles have good ears. They don't.

silent_fish May 31st, 2011 10:36
Basically you are an audiophile in disguise.

引用:
An Anti-Audiophile?
By Stephen Mejias • Posted: Oct 26, 2007
I was visited yesterday by Steve Krampf, CEO of Chestnut Hill Sound and designer of the George sound system. As we walked from our 6th floor lobby down the long hall to my office, the conversation somehow turned to various loudspeaker drivers. (That's just something that happens when you're in our office.)
"Are you an audiophile?" I asked seriously.

"I'd say I'm more of an anti-audiophile," he replied.

"An anti-audiophile?" I asked seriously.

"I guess that's enough to get me kicked out of here," he replied.

"Well, that depends on what you mean by anti-audiophile."

I really don't care about the labels. We can call ourselves audiophiles, we can call ourselves music lovers, we can even call ourselves "DUPs." If we share that powerful, almost irrational, appreciation for music and we share that urge to have our music sound as wonderful as possible, then we're speaking the same language.

It only took a couple of minutes with Steve Krampf for me to realize that we were, in fact, similar in some ways.

I certainly didn't kick him out of the office.

lighting May 31st, 2011 10:41
1 个附件
引用:
作者: hugoo (帖子 4192951)
我已经退烧啦 :belial:
就像下面这个家伙说的，我现在是anti-audiophile，只用pro-gear。 :belial:

嘿嘿，正在测试中，第一次用家里的系统测。

家里的系统不是pro-gear, 不到1000刀的系统，只是摩过Xonar Essence STX 和 Polkaudio M60 ：

ASUS Xonar Essence STX + Marantz SR 4023 + Polkaudio M60 + Klipsch Synergy Sub-12。



http://www.chinasmile.net/forums/att...1&d=1306852208

hugoo May 31st, 2011 10:44
I was just kidding. :smile:

You are 100% right about this..
and not only I am an audiophile, and also one with pretty high temperature too :belial:

引用:
作者: silent_fish (帖子 4193025)
Basically you are an audiophile in disguise.

silent_fish May 31st, 2011 10:44
Here comes the golden ear >>>>>>>> LIGHTING <<<<<<<<<<<<<

你有一对金耳朵！上万的系统就是为你设计的！

hugoo May 31st, 2011 10:45
真正的金耳朵终于出现了 :belial:

引用:
作者: lighting (帖子 4193028)
嘿嘿，正在测试中，第一次用家里的系统测。
家里的系统不是pro-gear, 不到1000刀的系统，只是摩过Xonar Essence STX 和 Polkaudio M60 ：
ASUS Xonar Essence STX + Marantz SR 4023 + Polkaudio M60 + ...

sgyyz May 31st, 2011 10:54
音响发烧友伤心的日子
 
Lighting，这应该是你想要表达的。:belial:

lighting May 31st, 2011 11:32
引用:
作者: sgyyz (帖子 4193050)
音响发烧友伤心的日子:belial:
可能是这个意思，我相信我的耳朵和你和Hugoo等是一样的，虽然在国内经常帮大款们选高档系统。

只是想证明抵挡系统离所谓的Hi-end系统，性能并不是如价格般，相差那么远！:belial:

lighting May 31st, 2011 11:44
引用:
作者: silent_fish (帖子 4193035)
Here comes the golden ear >>>>>>>> LIGHTING <<<<<<<<<<<<<

你有一对金耳朵！上万的系统就是为你设计的！
这个得让我老婆知道，才有意义！（她只愿意烧房子！:smile:）

老广 May 31st, 2011 12:27
silent_fish，hugoo，sgyyz舍得烧钱(当然首先是有钱，呵呵)，都是金耳朵。但似乎对软件花得不成比例了。:lol:
IMO，要HIFI，软件投资其实少过硬件。就是说我用SACD放，你上万元的设备放CD某程度上都不可比。
BTW，现在正在摸那个先锋的6.5" (百元价值的)箱，准备跟你们的20-30倍价钱的箱PK一番。:smile:

hugoo May 31st, 2011 12:28
引用:
作者: lighting (帖子 4193126)
只是想证明抵挡系统离所谓的Hi-end系统，性能并不是如价格般，相差那么远！:belial:
赞！ 理性发烧，量力而行。
确实是这样，可能为了2%的性能提升，要付出5倍多的价钱。
With advance of tech, in Hifi, the law of diminishing returns kicks in really early nowadays, 特别是音源/解码/功放，我觉得只有喇叭还是值得下点血本的，别的上个中档机器就很不错了。

lighting May 31st, 2011 12:30
1 个附件
继续Testing. 蛮好玩的测试！:biggrin:

http://www.chinasmile.net/forums/att...1&d=1306859373

老广 May 31st, 2011 12:33
引用:
作者: hugoo (帖子 4193230)
赞！ 理性发烧，量力而行。
确实是这样，可能为了2%的性能提升，要付出5倍多的价钱。
With advance of tech, in Hifi, the law of diminishing returns kicks in really early nowadays, 特别是音源/解码/功放，我觉得只有喇叭还是值得多花点钱的。
IMO，喇叭是最不值得花钱，就是最容易省钱的。 :biggrin:


所有时间均为格林尼治时间 -4。现在的时间是 20:27。
第1页，共3页 1 23
在一页显示本主题中的 40 个帖子


Copyright © 1999-2024 Chinasmile