查看单个帖子
旧 Jan 9th, 2011, 18:50     #45
sgyyz
Senior Member
级别:18 | 在线时长:420小时 | 升级还需:17小时级别:18 | 在线时长:420小时 | 升级还需:17小时级别:18 | 在线时长:420小时 | 升级还需:17小时级别:18 | 在线时长:420小时 | 升级还需:17小时级别:18 | 在线时长:420小时 | 升级还需:17小时级别:18 | 在线时长:420小时 | 升级还需:17小时
 
注册日期: Aug 2010
帖子: 1,485
积分:30
精华:7
sgyyz has a reputation beyond reputesgyyz has a reputation beyond reputesgyyz has a reputation beyond reputesgyyz has a reputation beyond reputesgyyz has a reputation beyond reputesgyyz has a reputation beyond reputesgyyz has a reputation beyond reputesgyyz has a reputation beyond reputesgyyz has a reputation beyond reputesgyyz has a reputation beyond reputesgyyz has a reputation beyond repute
默认

引用:
作者: catcherwogloves 查看帖子
这位老兄,你难道不知道bit perfect么?如果用电脑听音乐还不用bit perfect的话,我宁可搞个垃圾功放。windows mixer会给你混音的,这点你也能忍受?
Case by case. Give credit where credit is due (software vs. hardware)... 你所读到的论理未必全对。
我的试验证明,不用AV receiver的preamp section出来的音质要比用AV receiver好上许多。我只是要音量控制(AV receiver的volume knob-但这个早就音量数码化了),电脑播放器也有volume control,我就用它。很可能出来的bits已经不是bit-perfect(每个software player的algorithm都有所不同),但是

听声收货

我选择不要AV preamp。它很垃圾。

接下来,流浪家族就跳了出来说,为什么不干脆整个AV multi-channel都用电脑软件来控制。我觉得这是可行的option。
sgyyz 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖