查看单个帖子
旧 Jul 31st, 2011, 12:53     #17
nattawa
Senior Member
级别:6 | 在线时长:69小时 | 升级还需:8小时级别:6 | 在线时长:69小时 | 升级还需:8小时
 
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 165
nattawa has a reputation beyond reputenattawa has a reputation beyond reputenattawa has a reputation beyond reputenattawa has a reputation beyond reputenattawa has a reputation beyond reputenattawa has a reputation beyond reputenattawa has a reputation beyond reputenattawa has a reputation beyond reputenattawa has a reputation beyond reputenattawa has a reputation beyond reputenattawa has a reputation beyond repute
默认

引用:
作者: lighting 查看帖子
PHILIPS和SONY 拿出浑身解数,都搞不定SACD 转盘,放弃了SACD驱动系统的大批量生产,那市场上剩下的SACD 转盘,不就是精品中的精品?那市场上的CD 转盘,不管是6千还是6万,不都成了浮云?

既然dalplex同学问了:“假设给您个机会换CD机。请问您选那个?”

当然得老...
我记得SACD用的激光跟红皮书的激光都不是一个波长,伺服、RF前端也是两套不同的系统,这样的话,机器的CD部分的性能就跟SACD就没什么大关系了,甚至反而可以怀疑要在同一个机器里面兼顾播放不同的介质,技术上可能不得不做些妥协。

上面只是猜想,我自己没有SACD播放机,但用我的blu-ray机播放CD时在播放控制的响应上比起我的老AKAI CD机差的太远。
nattawa 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖