查看单个帖子
旧 Jul 27th, 2006, 16:32     #61
Pilotski
Senior Member
级别:12 | 在线时长:193小时 | 升级还需:28小时级别:12 | 在线时长:193小时 | 升级还需:28小时级别:12 | 在线时长:193小时 | 升级还需:28小时级别:12 | 在线时长:193小时 | 升级还需:28小时
 
注册日期: Feb 2006
帖子: 671
积分:5
精华:1
Pilotski has a reputation beyond reputePilotski has a reputation beyond reputePilotski has a reputation beyond reputePilotski has a reputation beyond reputePilotski has a reputation beyond reputePilotski has a reputation beyond reputePilotski has a reputation beyond reputePilotski has a reputation beyond reputePilotski has a reputation beyond reputePilotski has a reputation beyond reputePilotski has a reputation beyond repute
默认

引用:
作者: 野渡无人
安全性还有个有意思的问题,比如VOVOL号称安全吧.但是你让VOVOL S40撞上个丰田皮卡,一定会死.但是皮卡也有问题,翻车的大多数是皮卡.

所以,也许只有象AUDI Q7,VOVOL SC90,BENZ GL那样特大特重的SUV而且底盘设计性能类似轿车而不是卡车的车才够安全.

问题是,没几个...
这种大而重的crossover suv也有便宜的,象pacifica, freestyle, pilot, highlander, endeavor, murano...
大型crossover suv的rollover机率比传统的truck base suv小很多,几乎接近cars,加上使用电子稳定控制系统,安全性能已经很好了。如果再配上side airbag & curtain airbag,就更放心了。不过,这些大型suv对car的威胁很大: ...SUVs are better for their occupants in two-vehicle crashes than 'safety cars'....However, in multiple-vehicle crashes SUVs are probably between three (Bicycle Safety Almanac) and six (International Injury & Fatality Statistics) times more likely to kill the occupant of the other vehicle (car, cyclist, or pedestrian) than cars.
Pilotski 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖