查看单个帖子
旧 May 4th, 2007, 01:59     #2
老黑熊
Senior Member
级别:11 | 在线时长:178小时 | 升级还需:14小时级别:11 | 在线时长:178小时 | 升级还需:14小时级别:11 | 在线时长:178小时 | 升级还需:14小时
 
注册日期: Jan 2006
帖子: 107
老黑熊 has a reputation beyond repute老黑熊 has a reputation beyond repute老黑熊 has a reputation beyond repute老黑熊 has a reputation beyond repute老黑熊 has a reputation beyond repute老黑熊 has a reputation beyond repute老黑熊 has a reputation beyond repute老黑熊 has a reputation beyond repute老黑熊 has a reputation beyond repute老黑熊 has a reputation beyond repute老黑熊 has a reputation beyond repute
默认

可不可以这样理解:分居时并不一定需要双方签字的协议, 口头协议就可以,或者是连口头协议也没有。 当双方向法官递交那份文件时,双方确认分居事实就可以了?

如果这样理解正确的话, 一旦一方有意拖延,在那份文件上造成不一致的地方, 那么拖延的意图也就达成了?
老黑熊 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖