查看单个帖子
旧 Feb 13th, 2012, 08:31     #12
hcu-c
Senior Member
级别:58 | 在线时长:3656小时 | 升级还需:61小时级别:58 | 在线时长:3656小时 | 升级还需:61小时级别:58 | 在线时长:3656小时 | 升级还需:61小时级别:58 | 在线时长:3656小时 | 升级还需:61小时级别:58 | 在线时长:3656小时 | 升级还需:61小时级别:58 | 在线时长:3656小时 | 升级还需:61小时
 
注册日期: Mar 2008
帖子: 1,128
hcu-c has a reputation beyond reputehcu-c has a reputation beyond reputehcu-c has a reputation beyond reputehcu-c has a reputation beyond reputehcu-c has a reputation beyond reputehcu-c has a reputation beyond reputehcu-c has a reputation beyond reputehcu-c has a reputation beyond reputehcu-c has a reputation beyond reputehcu-c has a reputation beyond reputehcu-c has a reputation beyond repute
默认

其实这是民事和刑事案件判定原则的不同,刑事案件是推定无罪的原则,所以警方要判定你有罪,必须有足够的证据和人证来断定你有罪,类似交通法规类似的民事案件,出于成本的考虑,法官会采信警方的证言,推定你有罪,如果要推翻警方的罚单,你需要找出足够的证据或理由或人证来推翻警方的证言,这是你的责任去找证据和理由去打官司。
hcu-c 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
感谢 hcu-c
此篇文章之用户:
dalplex (Feb 13th, 2012)