查看单个帖子
旧 Oct 24th, 2012, 22:32     #52
老广
软件基本靠载 硬件基本靠拆
级别:50 | 在线时长:2796小时 | 升级还需:9小时级别:50 | 在线时长:2796小时 | 升级还需:9小时
 
老广 的头像
 
注册日期: Jul 2004
住址: GTA
帖子: 13,253
积分:52
精华:18
老广 has a reputation beyond repute老广 has a reputation beyond repute老广 has a reputation beyond repute老广 has a reputation beyond repute老广 has a reputation beyond repute老广 has a reputation beyond repute老广 has a reputation beyond repute老广 has a reputation beyond repute老广 has a reputation beyond repute老广 has a reputation beyond repute老广 has a reputation beyond repute
默认

前几天头脑发热,进了这个,今天刚发出。

转一些评论,关于它和5018的比较:from http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...d.php?t=935200
i have both and i just carry the 50mm macro with me all the time

I had a 50mm 1.8 and presently have the 50mm 2.5 CM. The 2.5 is a sharper and more versatile lens. Really nice edge to edge sharpness. The bokeh from 2.5 thru 3.2 has slightly better bokeh than the excellent 60mm 2.8 lens wide open. Nice to have the extreme close up option as well.

I have both lenses and the 50mm CM is a wonderful lens to use, even if it isn't a full macro lens. The MF ring is more accurate than the 50 1.8, which is very helpful. 50 CM is more sharper wide open than other one. 50 1.8 is used only in low light or if i want a shallower DOF and where the extra stop is beneficial. Though I am fairly sure i could live with out, I do prefer the 50 CM to the 501.8. If I had to choose one it would be the 50mm CM.

此帖于 Oct 24th, 2012 23:41 被 老广 编辑。
帅哥 老广 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖