查看单个帖子
旧 Nov 12th, 2011, 21:53     #13
torontolove
Senior Member
级别:34 | 在线时长:1356小时 | 升级还需:9小时级别:34 | 在线时长:1356小时 | 升级还需:9小时级别:34 | 在线时长:1356小时 | 升级还需:9小时级别:34 | 在线时长:1356小时 | 升级还需:9小时级别:34 | 在线时长:1356小时 | 升级还需:9小时级别:34 | 在线时长:1356小时 | 升级还需:9小时
 
torontolove 的头像
 
注册日期: Jul 2006
帖子: 1,852
积分:35
精华:11
torontolove has a reputation beyond reputetorontolove has a reputation beyond reputetorontolove has a reputation beyond reputetorontolove has a reputation beyond reputetorontolove has a reputation beyond reputetorontolove has a reputation beyond reputetorontolove has a reputation beyond reputetorontolove has a reputation beyond reputetorontolove has a reputation beyond reputetorontolove has a reputation beyond reputetorontolove has a reputation beyond repute
默认

你的分析的基本点是交通肇事不算刑事罪,是不是?

traffic violations属于刑事罪,所以原告是政府。告票上写的是plead guilty, guilty=有罪,liable=民事庭有责任。

引用:
作者: 老博 查看帖子
牛头不对马嘴的回复。

我说的是例如,刑事案件, blah, blah, blah,是否有罪

并没有说交通告票邀请陪审团,也没说有罪无罪,而是搞清是否有错

偷梁换柱的狡辩是没有用的。...

My lord, it is impossible. I am sorry.
torontolove 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
感谢 torontolove
此篇文章之用户:
红枫叶 (Nov 14th, 2011)