查看单个帖子
旧 Jan 29th, 2008, 15:08     #51
b777lr
Senior Member
级别:15 | 在线时长:314小时 | 升级还需:6小时级别:15 | 在线时长:314小时 | 升级还需:6小时级别:15 | 在线时长:314小时 | 升级还需:6小时
 
注册日期: Nov 2005
帖子: 1,995
b777lr has a reputation beyond reputeb777lr has a reputation beyond reputeb777lr has a reputation beyond reputeb777lr has a reputation beyond reputeb777lr has a reputation beyond reputeb777lr has a reputation beyond reputeb777lr has a reputation beyond reputeb777lr has a reputation beyond reputeb777lr has a reputation beyond reputeb777lr has a reputation beyond reputeb777lr has a reputation beyond repute
默认

引用:
作者: 500miles 查看帖子
说0.1米的肯定是白痴了,怎么也有一张A4纸那么大
OK, 我认定你说的A4纸,首先这就把那些“专家“的结论推翻了,如果是美国法庭,他们已经输了。

那么我再问,你把这A4纸,拿到10多米外拍,能出那样的效果吗?我说你拍不出来,因为树叶就要让你露馅了,树叶大小不配。这很快就能看出来,但实际上他们并没找出这样的破绽,没人说树叶大小和距离不配。

实际上几十万人在网上讲假照片,但没一个人真正做一边。就是加拿大,条件多好啊,也没人做一个拍一遍,看能否出那个效果,做起来有多难?对一个农民他怎么做?

如果你平面照片能搞到0.1米那么精确,那我也给你一张,你能否说出里面的景物大小距离多少?精确到0.1米?你根本就说不出来的,明显的这么论证你就输了吗。

这个事典型说明了中国人动嘴不动手的作风,千千万万的笨蛋。
b777lr 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖