刚刚付了2000定金给Queens MBA学院，又拿到多大 MBA Offer

Brian2004 · Mar 2nd, 2004, 23:14

各位大侠，Queens MBA 学院应该不如 UOT 吧。
可是 Queens 是 1 年 full time, UOT 是 3 年 part time。
上 Queens 需要跑到遥远的 kingston，真不知如何抉择。。。

安大略省政协 · Mar 3rd, 2004, 06:01

大牛

Brian2004 · Mar 3rd, 2004, 06:52

不牛

FridayNight · Mar 3rd, 2004, 08:59

http://www.infozee.com/indiatimes/ch...a-rankings.htm

老兄,看了RANKING再说话.

torter · Mar 3rd, 2004, 09:11

这个ranking看看好了，也算开眼。不过不要拿它报学校。错误无数，可能是太老了。不过怎么老，manitoba也排不到第二，ubc也不可能沦落到第12名。学费更是错的一塌糊涂。

Brian2004 · Mar 3rd, 2004, 09:22

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by torter:
这个ranking看看好了，也算开眼。不过不要拿它报学校。错误无数，可能是太老了。不过怎么老，manitoba也排不到第二，ubc也不可能沦落到第12名。学费更是错的一塌糊涂。<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

torter 说的对. 多大这个是3年的,学费一样的

Brian2004 · Mar 3rd, 2004, 09:24

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by FridayNight:
http://www.infozee.com/indiatimes/ch...a-rankings.htm

老兄,看了RANKING再说话.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

FridayNight 大哥,我看过另外一个国内网站上的 ranking，加拿大中的商学院 uot, uoy(ork) 都排在 queens 前面。但是我也听说 queens 排在数一数二，实在搞不清楚

xiao5 · Mar 3rd, 2004, 09:44

想当年我也付了2000块给Ivey，最后还是去了Rotman，白白损失2000。

学校自己选，谁也说不好。不过Rotman的part-time学生到了二年级可以转成Fulltime，如果你愿意的话。

FridayNight · Mar 3rd, 2004, 09:51

有道理.确实没法看,不同网站上的排名相差很多.

xuanxuan · Mar 3rd, 2004, 11:18

金融背景, 从业目标也是金融的话, 选择多大可能好一些.
IT 或工程背景, QUEEN'S 也许更合适.
另外早毕业也是QUEEN'S一个优势, 毕竟MBA越来越多, 日益贬值.

其实都不是HARVARD, WHARTON, 也都不是不入流的商学院.
不管怎么选, 对事业的轨迹大概没有本质影响, 应该说都是正确的选择, 不需要那么多思想斗争.

打个比方, 加航温哥华转机,韩航汉城专机, 但目的地都是北京.
犯不上为选哪个费尽脑汁.

实在拿不准, 抛硬币决定就可以了.

xuanxuan · Mar 3rd, 2004, 11:21

发重了

iambigcat · Mar 3rd, 2004, 11:57

大牛选queen，不牛选rotman。queen是培养manager的，rotman是培养finance专才的。

xiao兄，华枫上的兄弟都等着你的文章呢，快快出山吧！

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by xiao5:
想当年我也付了2000块给Ivey，最后还是去了Rotman，白白损失2000。

学校自己选，谁也说不好。不过Rotman的part-time学生到了二年级可以转成Fulltime，如果你愿意的话。<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

keep-on-working · Mar 3rd, 2004, 12:00

牛。

还是去queens吧，一年就毕业。其实MBA的排名一直在变，UT也就是近2，3年才牛起来的。同意xuanxuan观点。

问一下queens学费几何？？

candy_tang · Mar 3rd, 2004, 17:49

天道酬勤大侠：
我正在准备考托和GMAT，QUEEN’S是我响往的学校。我想请教一下，你是什么样的背景。Ｔ和Ｇ的成绩多少。想给自己作个标准。
　　我是学计算机的，硕士，国内从业十年。去年已登陆后回国。完成目前公司的工作后，申请明年的ＱＵＥＥＮ’ＳＭＢＡ。
　　谢谢！

venture · Mar 3rd, 2004, 18:36

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by iambigcat:
大牛选queen，不牛选rotman。queen是培养manager的，rotman是培养finance专才的。<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

queen一年就能出manager？ rotman两年只能出专才？

天涯剑客 · Mar 3rd, 2004, 19:24

要是我，选多大。

我也正头痛呢。。交了YORK的定金，极有可能拿到QUEEN的OFFER。。。也在想去YORK还是QUEEN。。大家也帮忙提点意见。。

天涯剑客 · Mar 3rd, 2004, 19:28

另：

和多大比起来，
去QUEEN好象不象多大那么容易GET THE LOAN。。而且没有奖学金，没有INTERSHIP。。找工作风险我觉得大些。。

Brian2004 · Mar 4th, 2004, 22:18

是不是大家都觉得还是多大的学位回国用会更好一些？

venture · Mar 5th, 2004, 10:50

No big difference if you want to go back China.

Will have much difference if you want to work in Toronto.

It is hard to get appropriate suggestion from others. Depends on your background, age, career interest, financial situation etc.

Basically, if you are less experienced and haven't decided what to do, in a 2-year program you will have more time to practice (summer job and interviews) and to think about future career path......

Also, in a 2 year program, the first year is more about fundamental theory study, the second year is more about knowledge application...I don't know how can these two aspects be accomplished in 1 year, especially for most less-experienced people.

iambigcat · Mar 5th, 2004, 11:43

strongly agree!

天涯剑客,

Did york give you any scholorship or bursary ?

Have you make investigation on York's placement posibility?

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by venture:
No big difference if you want to go back China.

Will have much difference if you want to work in Toronto.

It is hard to get appropriate suggestion from others. Depends on your background, age, career interest, financial situation etc.

Basically, if you are less experienced and haven't decided what to do, in a 2-year program you will have more time to practice (summer job and interviews) and to think about future career path......

Also, in a 2 year program, the first year is more about fundamental theory study, the second year is more about knowledge application...I don't know how can these two aspects be accomplished in 1 year, especially for most less-experienced people.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Mar 2nd, 2004, 23:14	#1
Brian2004 Junior Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 19	各位大侠，Queens MBA 学院应该不如 UOT 吧。可是 Queens 是 1 年 full time, UOT 是 3 年 part time。上 Queens 需要跑到遥远的 kingston，真不知如何抉择。。。
Brian2004 Junior Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 19

Mar 3rd, 2004, 06:01	只看该作者 #2
安大略省政协 Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 39 声望: 0	大牛
安大略省政协 Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 39 声望: 0

Mar 3rd, 2004, 06:52	只看该作者 #3
Brian2004 Junior Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 19 声望: 0	不牛
Brian2004 Junior Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 19 声望: 0

Mar 3rd, 2004, 08:59	只看该作者 #4
FridayNight Senior Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 103 声望: 0	http://www.infozee.com/indiatimes/ch...a-rankings.htm 老兄,看了RANKING再说话.
FridayNight Senior Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 103 声望: 0

Mar 3rd, 2004, 09:11	只看该作者 #5
torter Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 60 声望: 7509	这个ranking看看好了，也算开眼。不过不要拿它报学校。错误无数，可能是太老了。不过怎么老，manitoba也排不到第二，ubc也不可能沦落到第12名。学费更是错的一塌糊涂。
torter Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 60 声望: 7509

Mar 3rd, 2004, 09:22	只看该作者 #6
Brian2004 Junior Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 19 声望: 0	<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by torter: 这个ranking看看好了，也算开眼。不过不要拿它报学校。错误无数，可能是太老了。不过怎么老，manitoba也排不到第二，ubc也不可能沦落到第12名。学费更是错的一塌糊涂。<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> torter 说的对. 多大这个是3年的,学费一样的
Brian2004 Junior Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 19 声望: 0

Mar 3rd, 2004, 09:24	只看该作者 #7
Brian2004 Junior Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 19 声望: 0	<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by FridayNight: http://www.infozee.com/indiatimes/ch...a-rankings.htm 老兄,看了RANKING再说话.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> FridayNight 大哥,我看过另外一个国内网站上的 ranking，加拿大中的商学院 uot, uoy(ork) 都排在 queens 前面。但是我也听说 queens 排在数一数二，实在搞不清楚
Brian2004 Junior Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 19 声望: 0

Mar 3rd, 2004, 09:44	只看该作者 #8
xiao5 Junior Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 19 声望: 0	想当年我也付了2000块给Ivey，最后还是去了Rotman，白白损失2000。学校自己选，谁也说不好。不过Rotman的part-time学生到了二年级可以转成Fulltime，如果你愿意的话。
xiao5 Junior Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 19 声望: 0

Mar 3rd, 2004, 09:51	只看该作者 #9
FridayNight Senior Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 103 声望: 0	有道理.确实没法看,不同网站上的排名相差很多.
FridayNight Senior Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 103 声望: 0

Mar 3rd, 2004, 11:18	只看该作者 #10
xuanxuan Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 41 声望: 98	金融背景, 从业目标也是金融的话, 选择多大可能好一些. IT 或工程背景, QUEEN'S 也许更合适. 另外早毕业也是QUEEN'S一个优势, 毕竟MBA越来越多, 日益贬值. 其实都不是HARVARD, WHARTON, 也都不是不入流的商学院. 不管怎么选, 对事业的轨迹大概没有本质影响, 应该说都是正确的选择, 不需要那么多思想斗争. 打个比方, 加航温哥华转机,韩航汉城专机, 但目的地都是北京. 犯不上为选哪个费尽脑汁. 实在拿不准, 抛硬币决定就可以了.
xuanxuan Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 41 声望: 98

Mar 3rd, 2004, 11:21	只看该作者 #11
xuanxuan Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 41 声望: 98	发重了
xuanxuan Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 41 声望: 98

Mar 3rd, 2004, 11:57	只看该作者 #12
iambigcat 新知青注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 211 声望: 78	大牛选queen，不牛选rotman。queen是培养manager的，rotman是培养finance专才的。 xiao兄，华枫上的兄弟都等着你的文章呢，快快出山吧！ <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by xiao5: 想当年我也付了2000块给Ivey，最后还是去了Rotman，白白损失2000。学校自己选，谁也说不好。不过Rotman的part-time学生到了二年级可以转成Fulltime，如果你愿意的话。<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
iambigcat 新知青注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 211 声望: 78

Mar 3rd, 2004, 12:00	只看该作者 #13
keep-on-working Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 77 声望: 0	牛。还是去queens吧，一年就毕业。其实MBA的排名一直在变，UT也就是近2，3年才牛起来的。同意xuanxuan观点。问一下queens学费几何？？
keep-on-working Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 77 声望: 0

Mar 3rd, 2004, 17:49	只看该作者 #14
candy_tang Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 32 声望: 0	天道酬勤大侠：我正在准备考托和GMAT，QUEEN’S是我响往的学校。我想请教一下，你是什么样的背景。Ｔ和Ｇ的成绩多少。想给自己作个标准。　　我是学计算机的，硕士，国内从业十年。去年已登陆后回国。完成目前公司的工作后，申请明年的ＱＵＥＥＮ’ＳＭＢＡ。　　谢谢！
candy_tang Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 32 声望: 0

Mar 3rd, 2004, 18:36	只看该作者 #15
venture Junior Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 12 声望: 0	<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by iambigcat: 大牛选queen，不牛选rotman。queen是培养manager的，rotman是培养finance专才的。<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> queen一年就能出manager？ rotman两年只能出专才？
venture Junior Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 12 声望: 0

Mar 3rd, 2004, 19:24	只看该作者 #16
天涯剑客 Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 57 声望: 0	要是我，选多大。我也正头痛呢。。交了YORK的定金，极有可能拿到QUEEN的OFFER。。。也在想去YORK还是QUEEN。。大家也帮忙提点意见。。
天涯剑客 Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 57 声望: 0

Mar 3rd, 2004, 19:28	只看该作者 #17
天涯剑客 Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 57 声望: 0	另：和多大比起来，去QUEEN好象不象多大那么容易GET THE LOAN。。而且没有奖学金，没有INTERSHIP。。找工作风险我觉得大些。。
天涯剑客 Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 57 声望: 0

Mar 4th, 2004, 22:18	只看该作者 #18
Brian2004 Junior Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 19 声望: 0	是不是大家都觉得还是多大的学位回国用会更好一些？
Brian2004 Junior Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 19 声望: 0

Mar 5th, 2004, 10:50	只看该作者 #19
venture Junior Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 12 声望: 0	No big difference if you want to go back China. Will have much difference if you want to work in Toronto. It is hard to get appropriate suggestion from others. Depends on your background, age, career interest, financial situation etc. Basically, if you are less experienced and haven't decided what to do, in a 2-year program you will have more time to practice (summer job and interviews) and to think about future career path...... Also, in a 2 year program, the first year is more about fundamental theory study, the second year is more about knowledge application...I don't know how can these two aspects be accomplished in 1 year, especially for most less-experienced people.
venture Junior Member 注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 12 声望: 0

Mar 5th, 2004, 11:43	只看该作者 #20
iambigcat 新知青注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 211 声望: 78	strongly agree! 天涯剑客, Did york give you any scholorship or bursary ? Have you make investigation on York's placement posibility? <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by venture: No big difference if you want to go back China. Will have much difference if you want to work in Toronto. It is hard to get appropriate suggestion from others. Depends on your background, age, career interest, financial situation etc. Basically, if you are less experienced and haven't decided what to do, in a 2-year program you will have more time to practice (summer job and interviews) and to think about future career path...... Also, in a 2 year program, the first year is more about fundamental theory study, the second year is more about knowledge application...I don't know how can these two aspects be accomplished in 1 year, especially for most less-experienced people.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
iambigcat 新知青注册日期: Jul 2004 帖子: 211 声望: 78