May 27th, 2011, 00:43 | 只看该作者 #61 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jan 2008
帖子: 1,974
积分:11
精华:4
|
ARC好东西呀,100w/channel, 还推不动ProAc? RayLumley75w/c, 推Utopid却没问题, 搞不懂呀,这功放箱子配对真是个头疼的事。 引用:
|
|
|
May 27th, 2011, 01:04 | 只看该作者 #66 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jan 2008
帖子: 1,974
积分:11
精华:4
声望: 1172365
|
是呀,pro那些公司做了很多R&D在研究这些,现在已经开始直接数码信号进监听箱,从解码到功放到喇叭单元到箱体完全一体化设计,这种把重放器材当成一个系统工程来设计的好处就是很多地方可以进行优化,很好的解决你说的失真,相移和瞬态响应等等那些问题。 我觉得这很make sense,传统的那种做法,设计功放不知道要推什么喇叭,设计喇叭的不知道会用什么功放来推,很弱智的说,功放和喇叭要成一个系统才能发声,当然是以系统工程的方法来设计才能很好的解决系统的问题嘛。 看看那些HIFI公司,几十年了又有什么进步 ?还是那个老架构,没有什么大的突破,很多就是靠卖个牌子,真正花钱在R&D的又有几家呢? |
|
May 27th, 2011, 01:13 | 只看该作者 #67 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Aug 2010
住址: GTA
帖子: 264
声望: 0
|
100W tube amp 推ProAC Response 2, 能推动,也就是能让高低音喇叭进入最好的工作区(不知这个词是否准确)。但是:tube amp 对大型低音喇叭控制不好,是所有tube amp的主要问题。 引用:
听电子鼓,或电影里的电子合成低音,是听不出问题的 |
|
|
May 27th, 2011, 01:55 | 只看该作者 #71 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jan 2008
帖子: 1,974
积分:11
精华:4
声望: 1172365
|
确实是的,买一堆死沉的功放音箱回家看着都爽,有源的箱子比起来就太不起眼了,不入很多人法眼完全可以理解,这上面我算是个另类 我这初烧啥也不懂,被那帮写HIFI器材review的给忽悠,以前看他们写的天花乱坠的,其实听了也就那么回事嘛,太多的hype,很turn me off, pro那边就好很多,毕竟那帮子人都是天天玩音乐,经常听现场真乐器的,不那么好忽悠,杂志上review写的都平实的多,这点让人放心多了。 我对低音抱着宁缺毋滥的态度,不喜欢轰隆隆的低音,听着难受,相反就是喜欢小提琴高音高上去那种感觉,爽呀 此帖于 May 27th, 2011 02:21 被 hugoo 编辑。 |
|
May 27th, 2011, 08:22 | 只看该作者 #73 | ||
Senior Member
注册日期: Aug 2010
住址: GTA
帖子: 264
声望: 0
|
Focal Alto Utopia, 国内叫-乌托邦
引用:
引用:
注意这个Ben的房间用了低音陷阱和扩散板。 |
||
|
May 27th, 2011, 08:28 | 只看该作者 #74 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Aug 2010
帖子: 1,485
积分:30
精华:7
声望: 64837
|
Abbey Road Studio
呵呵。忘了提。。。 英国的Abbey Road Studio,B&W 800 Diamond 的代言,一大堆Classe功放。 还是有商业业录音室(Abbey Road 是世界数一数二的)用这样的settings。 Abbey Road甚至还出售自己品牌的线材。 http://www.bowers-wilkins.com/Discov...bbey-Road.html |
|
May 27th, 2011, 08:29 | 只看该作者 #75 | |
软件基本靠载 硬件基本靠拆
注册日期: Jul 2004
住址: GTA
帖子: 13,253
积分:52
精华:18
声望: 3174223
|
引用:
BTW,虽然没听过,但凭直觉这种喇叭好。以后有机会DIY一套。 |
|
|
May 27th, 2011, 08:33 | 只看该作者 #76 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Aug 2010
帖子: 1,485
积分:30
精华:7
声望: 64837
|
100K你不睡觉?
引用:
那是什么功放?比我看到的大很多!这对应该是比Alto大一号的。它有两个midrange。应该是Grand Utopia了! |
|
|
May 27th, 2011, 08:48 | 只看该作者 #77 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jan 2008
帖子: 1,974
积分:11
精华:4
声望: 1172365
|
引用:
人的主观听感真是千差万别,老广你是觉得Solo高音太强,低音没有,下面这个家伙跟你正相反 http://www.gearslutz.com/board/so-mu...-solo-6-a.html 在3楼: FWIW I have SM8, Solo6 and CMS-50 monitors here, and they all sound good…but different. Relative to each other, my non-scientific description of the sound character is: SM8- Very flat freq response; ideal for critical mix decisions. Sounds like there is no crossover. Non-ported design keeps low end audible, yet tight, in varied listening environments. Great mixes sound great on SM8; other mixes have all their flaws revealed. This is the desert island mixing monitor for me. Solo6- Fun to listen to these! Low end is bigger than you'd expect. No subwoofer necessary for my taste. Less accurate, but less clinical, than SM8. While SM8 is a "work" tool, Solo6 is what I would choose for pleasure. Nothing digital here, so the crossover slope isn't as steep, but I can still mix on Solo6. Some guys master on them. Dave Kutch, a successful mastering engineer, who has a studio called The Mastering Palace in NYC, 用Solo做他的mastering monitor, mastered Alicia keys' latest CD, here is a interview with him talking about why he used Solo as a mastering monitor. 这些pro听现场的机会,比我们要多的多,他们的参照系也比我们要准的多,他能用solo来当mastering monitor,说明什么? Dave Kutch on mastering Alicia Keys new album The Element of Freedom http://www.sonicscoop.com/2009/12/16...tch-mastering/ The Focals saved my ass on my first album with Alicia. The Solo6 Be monitors worked, and I’m not going to change that. They’re tight, non ear-fatiguing, and have a ridiculous amount of sub for such a small speaker. They just work. Obviously speakers are very subjective, but for me they work perfectly. I started using these for the last record, and I’ve been using them ever since. I was only using them a month prior to As I Am – Fab (from NYC’s Flux Studios) told me I had to try the Focals. It was the sound I was looking for. 此帖于 May 27th, 2011 09:12 被 hugoo 编辑。 |
|
|
May 27th, 2011, 08:54 | 只看该作者 #78 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jan 2008
帖子: 1,974
积分:11
精华:4
声望: 1172365
|
老广呀,DIY玩玩没问题,只是可别把自己DIY的喇叭当成reference system,要当的话,至少先把你那箱子频响做成40-20khz +/-3dB再说,光靠自己的耳朵听和直觉,还是远远不够的 有门的箱子要真像你说的那样,我就奇怪了,你们DIY就全靠耳朵听吗?频响是可以测的,至少搞平一点吧? 高音完全没有,这还叫什么高保真?一点客观标准都没有啦,全凭自己耳朵的喜好?not my cup of tea.. 你是没听过正常的高音,耳朵对高音太敏感啦。 此帖于 May 27th, 2011 09:18 被 hugoo 编辑。 |
|
May 27th, 2011, 09:03 | 只看该作者 #79 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jan 2008
帖子: 1,974
积分:11
精华:4
声望: 1172365
|
这一套下来得多少钱呀?5万加币够吗? 引用:
|
|
|