Nov 10th, 2004, 14:37 | 只看该作者 #21 | |
退休市长
注册日期: Jul 2004
住址: CANADA
帖子: 8,546
积分:4
精华:2
|
就忘了RRSP每年7-15%利滚利的增长了, 引用:
|
|
|
Nov 10th, 2004, 14:38 | 只看该作者 #22 | ||
Senior Member
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 393
声望: 140425
|
多谢各位!欢迎大家正反两方继续讨论! ca416371,谢谢你!我已经把她的个案情况贴出来了,你有什么高招能帮她“把mortgage尽早还完,每个月的还款额却并不增加”可以尽管讲出来了。虽然那可能不是下之四海而皆准的,但最起码让大家从这个个案中得到点启示了。 引用:
引用:
|
||
|
Nov 10th, 2004, 14:50 | 只看该作者 #23 | |
Chinese and Calgarian
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 521
声望: 243044
|
引用:
Try to be consistent! is that why you call yourself 市政府 because 市政府 is always change the policy? haha, I got you!. |
|
|
Nov 10th, 2004, 15:05 | 只看该作者 #24 | |
Chinese and Calgarian
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 521
声望: 243044
|
引用:
you are somehow right. The performance of the RRSP is a key to say which one is better. If you can make RRSP每年7-15%利滚利的增长, of course buying RRSP is better than paying mortgage, but who can guaranty that? However the 5% or more interest on Mortgage is fixed. so it is a personal choice here, not simple answer. 此帖于 Nov 10th, 2004 15:12 被 Tiger04 编辑。 |
|
|
Nov 10th, 2004, 15:05 | 只看该作者 #25 | |
退休市长
注册日期: Jul 2004
住址: CANADA
帖子: 8,546
积分:4
精华:2
声望: 44862667
|
你就仔细深入地学习体会吧, 引用:
|
|
|
Nov 10th, 2004, 17:20 | 只看该作者 #27 | |
Member
注册日期: Oct 2004
帖子: 69
声望: 73
|
引用:
首先看他先生是否在报税时申报国内的收入,就算报估计额度也很少吧?那先生和孩子就算做她的dependants可以降低一部分应缴税收入;然后再算买多少RRSP可以降低一个tax bracket。估摸着就买这个数字吧。买完后再有余钱+RRSP退税后的钱都还mortgage。最后,RRSP应该买在先生名下。如果先生一分钱收入都不报,或者很低,他可以第二年取出来,就算当作他当年收入计算,只要总收入在8000以下(包括取出RRSP的部分)他就不用上税。这样这笔钱又可以还进mortgage里去。 我毕竟不是搞经济的,还请专家们斧正。 |
|
|
Nov 10th, 2004, 19:21 | 只看该作者 #28 | |
Member
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 59
声望: 0
|
引用:
1. Money put in RRSP are going to get its returns tax defered; 2. I can call back ALL the tax later when you are taking money out of the RRSP account. What you need is just a good strategy. |
|
|
Nov 11th, 2004, 00:00 | 只看该作者 #30 | |
Chinese and Calgarian
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 521
声望: 243044
|
引用:
1. the gain on the house price increases (for own living house)or the money saved on rental are not tax defered, but totally tax free 2. the one can pay off the mortgage first, and then buy the RRSP to catch the tax cut benifit, because the RRSP room can be defered forever. |
|
|
Nov 11th, 2004, 00:06 | 只看该作者 #31 | |
Chinese and Calgarian
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 521
声望: 243044
|
引用:
1. the gain on the house price increases (for own living house)or the money saved on rental are not tax defered, but totally tax free 2. the one can pay off the mortgage first, and then buy the RRSP to catch the tax cut benifit, because the RRSP room can be defered forever. |
|
|
Nov 11th, 2004, 00:24 | 只看该作者 #32 |
Member
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 59
声望: 0
|
1. the gain on the house price increases (for own living house)or the money saved on rental are not tax defered, but totally tax free As long as you still live there, it is tax free. However, when you sell it, it is another story if you don't plan beforehead. If you do not sell, what is the benefit the so-called price increases going to bring to you? 2. the one can pay off the mortgage first, and then buy the RRSP to catch the tax cut benifit, because the RRSP room can be defered forever. Seems either your English is not good enough to catch my meaning at all, or you are just trying to mislead others. There are a lot of ways to get your RRSP money out of the RRSP account tax free. However, not every one has enough knowledge to make the necessary arrangements. |
|
Nov 11th, 2004, 00:32 | 只看该作者 #35 | |
Chinese and Calgarian
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 521
声望: 243044
|
引用:
2. sorry, I did not follow your second point there. it seems you misunderstand my point. when I say tax cut benifit from RRSP. I did not mean the time get the money out of RRSP. some people said when they buy RRSP they could save some tax right away, 30% or whatever. I just want to remember that you could always get that tax cut later, if you pay your mortage right now and buy RRSP later. |
|
|
Nov 11th, 2004, 00:33 | 只看该作者 #36 | |
Junior Member
注册日期: Sep 2004
帖子: 28
声望: 2663380
|
引用:
好象不是第二年取出来吧, 我记得是投进去两年后才可以,否则还是算妻子的取的那年的收入. 如果将来以先生的名义取出并当作先生的收入,那么妻子报税时就少了7千多先生无收入的免税额,所以也没占到便宜. |
|
|
Nov 11th, 2004, 08:24 | 只看该作者 #37 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 3,075
声望: 1742634
|
引用:
|
|
|
Nov 11th, 2004, 15:02 | 只看该作者 #38 | |
Chinese and Calgarian
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 521
声望: 243044
|
引用:
if you have RRSP room $10000 every year, that means if you buy RRSP in full every year, you will save tax: $10000*22%=$2200. after 3 years, you save $6600, and use $30000 your income. you can not save $10000*22%*3year+$10000*22%*2year+$10000*22%*1year=$12000. that is what I mean you can save the tax cut benifit 22%(or whatever) once in a life time. comparing with someone who use this $10000 in their mortage, the person will save $10000*5% every year till you pay off your mortage. use above example, for 3years delay of total $30000(of course if you do not buy RRSP, you might not have $30000 in hand, because you have to pay tax), you have to pay interests: $10000*5%*3year+$10000*5%*2year+$10000*5%*1year. That is the different, hope you can understand. Just want to remind you, you could alway get the $6600 tax saving on $30000 RRSP later, because the RRSP room can be forward forever, which means, if you do not buy any RRSP in the above example, in fours year, you will have total $40000 RRSP room. if you buy it in full, you will still save $8800 (the same result as you buy RRSP every year). |
|
|
Nov 11th, 2004, 16:07 | 只看该作者 #39 |
Member
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 59
声望: 0
|
Tiger04: Your calculation makes no sense to me. Let me show you something. OK, now suppose she is getting some RRSP first, say 10k/year, that means she is making 10k/18%=55k/year, and here in Ontario, her Marginal Tax Rate would be 31.15%, not 22%. For simpilicity, let's make it 30%. So the 1st year she is saving: 10k*30%=3k. Let's just look at this 10k. The key benefit of RRSP is that ALL investment gains within are tax sheltered. Now let's assume she is making only 4% gains there, which is VERY SAFE to get, with a risk which is next to none. In 20 years, the 10k money she has there would be: 21.9k. Now let's see what happens if she does not buy RRSP, instead used this money to pay back mortgage. 1st she is taxed 30%, which means she has only 7k to pay back the mortgage. With 7k @ 5%, 20 years later it would have been: 18.57k or 18.6k. She could have taken 21.9k out of her RRSP to pay off the mortgage and save herself 3.3k on this 10k! Make sense? |
|
Nov 11th, 2004, 16:47 | 只看该作者 #40 | |
Member
注册日期: Oct 2004
帖子: 69
声望: 73
|
引用:
|
|
|