返回   华枫论坛 > ◆主题论坛◆ > 视听发烧站



发表新主题 回复
推荐  
查看全部 主题工具
旧 May 31st, 2011, 10:36     #1
silent_fish
Senior Member
级别:9 | 在线时长:122小时 | 升级还需:18小时级别:9 | 在线时长:122小时 | 升级还需:18小时级别:9 | 在线时长:122小时 | 升级还需:18小时级别:9 | 在线时长:122小时 | 升级还需:18小时级别:9 | 在线时长:122小时 | 升级还需:18小时
 
silent_fish 的头像
 
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 635
积分:8
精华:3
silent_fish is an unknown quantity at this point
默认

Basically you are an audiophile in disguise.

引用:
An Anti-Audiophile?
By Stephen Mejias • Posted: Oct 26, 2007
I was visited yesterday by Steve Krampf, CEO of Chestnut Hill Sound and designer of the George sound system. As we walked from our 6th floor lobby down the long hall to my office, the conversation somehow turned to various loudspeaker drivers. (That's just something that happens when you're in our office.)
"Are you an audiophile?" I asked seriously.

"I'd say I'm more of an anti-audiophile," he replied.

"An anti-audiophile?" I asked seriously.

"I guess that's enough to get me kicked out of here," he replied.

"Well, that depends on what you mean by anti-audiophile."

I really don't care about the labels. We can call ourselves audiophiles, we can call ourselves music lovers, we can even call ourselves "DUPs." If we share that powerful, almost irrational, appreciation for music and we share that urge to have our music sound as wonderful as possible, then we're speaking the same language.

It only took a couple of minutes with Steve Krampf for me to realize that we were, in fact, similar in some ways.

I certainly didn't kick him out of the office.
silent_fish 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
旧 May 31st, 2011, 10:44     #2
silent_fish
Senior Member
级别:9 | 在线时长:122小时 | 升级还需:18小时级别:9 | 在线时长:122小时 | 升级还需:18小时级别:9 | 在线时长:122小时 | 升级还需:18小时级别:9 | 在线时长:122小时 | 升级还需:18小时级别:9 | 在线时长:122小时 | 升级还需:18小时
 
silent_fish 的头像
 
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 635
积分:8
精华:3
声望: 3
silent_fish is an unknown quantity at this point
默认

Here comes the golden ear >>>>>>>> LIGHTING <<<<<<<<<<<<<

你有一对金耳朵!上万的系统就是为你设计的!

此帖于 May 31st, 2011 11:25 被 silent_fish 编辑。
silent_fish 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
感谢 silent_fish
此篇文章之用户:
lighting (Jun 3rd, 2011)
旧 May 31st, 2011, 14:36     #3
silent_fish
Senior Member
级别:9 | 在线时长:122小时 | 升级还需:18小时级别:9 | 在线时长:122小时 | 升级还需:18小时级别:9 | 在线时长:122小时 | 升级还需:18小时级别:9 | 在线时长:122小时 | 升级还需:18小时级别:9 | 在线时长:122小时 | 升级还需:18小时
 
silent_fish 的头像
 
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 635
积分:8
精华:3
声望: 3
silent_fish is an unknown quantity at this point
默认

from my memory about SACD, both SACD and high-res flac are very much alike, very detail, also detail is the reason why I switched to use DAC. (Thanks Ken!)

The downside of SACD or high-res is that in small system, the sound don't have as much weight as regular CD.
silent_fish 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
感谢 silent_fish
此篇文章之用户:
hugoo (May 31st, 2011)
发表新主题 回复


发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以发表回复
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑自己的帖子

启用 BB 代码
论坛启用 表情符号
论坛启用 [IMG] 代码
论坛禁用 HTML 代码



所有时间均为格林尼治时间 -4。现在的时间是 06:02

请尊重文章原创者,转帖请注明来源及原作者。
凡是本站用户自行发布的任何信息,皆不代表本站的立场,
华枫网站不确保各类信息的正确性和可靠性,也不承担由此而导致的任何直接或间接损失以及任何法律责任。

Copyright © 1999-2024 Chinasmile