Feb 9th, 2010, 10:24 | 只看该作者 #242 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Apr 2009
帖子: 858
积分:8
精华:2
声望: 1564823
|
引用:
有N3在前面堵,有internet电视在后面追,相信那些看盗版卫星电视的总人数在迅速减少。卫星接收机厂家的正进入一个杀鸡取卵的恶性循环:要养活厂家和coders就只有靠不停的淘汰旧机子来圈钱,但随着使用成本的升高,又会吓走更多的新老用户,导致市场进一步萎缩。 看吧,我认为随着网络带宽的不断增加,要不几年,internet电视最终会取代烧锅的。 |
|
|
感谢 qwertyonly 此篇文章之用户: |
Ellesmeer (Feb 9th, 2010) |
Feb 9th, 2010, 14:10 | 只看该作者 #248 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jan 2007
帖子: 2,919
积分:6
精华:2
声望: 404694
|
以后这TV Over IP是不可避免的,但起码那要等到千M光纤到户才有可行性(还不一定成),因为在线电影电视最大的问题在于中央交换机的压力,1万用户同时看高清电视,就能把现在最先进的骨干网交换机弄瘫了,更不要说下边的小交换机了,除非出了千G甚至是百T级别的核心交换机,不然实在是压力太大了。 电视网络最大的好处在于广播性,一根线缆上跑的节目能供千万用户收看,而IP网络的最大优势却是在巨大的可操控性和自由选择,两者是两个极端,很难综合在一起了。除非IP网络的设备都换成支持组播的,但还需要控制区域播放.......,反正这问题是大到人人头疼的地步了。 |
|
Feb 10th, 2010, 08:31 | 只看该作者 #249 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jul 2005
帖子: 2,318
积分:12
精华:2
声望: 1172125
|
昨晚冒着严寒,把UNIVERSAL的LNB加上去了,固定LNB是个大问题,一直尝试用别的LNB的bracket来固定UNIVERSAL的LNB,但不行,因为UNIVERSAL的LNB需要稍微指向下才能收到95星的CCTV4.所以只好用金属丝和91的LNB绑在一起.很担心其牢固度. 另外,91星得从SWITCH上撤下来,否则95上就没信号. SWITCH的质量怎么这么不好?还好对110,118,119没影响. |
华枫名人录 1.ChinaSmileJoe 2.掉线掉得屁屁疼 3.柴可夫斯基 4.七月七, 阿童木, WUYONG, HELIANGWU 8.伤心500刀,无事生非 10.NFG 11.深海老鱼 ...... 1000.狮王(不做大哥很多年) |
|
|
Feb 10th, 2010, 16:10 | 只看该作者 #251 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 401
声望: 3313240
|
引用:
Bell 现在还在测试阶段, 收费TV+ 25M光纤internet (包HD-PVR box, wireless modem)只要$49起. |
|
|
Feb 10th, 2010, 17:05 | 只看该作者 #252 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jan 2007
帖子: 2,919
积分:6
精华:2
声望: 404694
|
引用:
比如说,有1000个如你一样的用户,如果他们看Bell的电视完全没问题,但某天其中一半的人发现罗渣子的电视更好看,于是他们一起看了,这时候Bell的网管就哭了。 你用的是IPTV的最基础形式,而未来的目标则是随意点播电视播放。 |
|
|
Feb 10th, 2010, 19:46 | 只看该作者 #253 |
Junior Member
注册日期: Jan 2010
帖子: 7
声望: 0
|
看来Nfusion一时半会儿是回不来了
看来Nfusion一时半会儿是回不来了 Nfusion 的superstar被DN和BEV在安省法庭告了 http://canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/200...anlii71008.pdf http://canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/201...010onsc761.pdf 不知为啥是在安省法庭告他,难道他是安省的,不是US的。 |
|
Feb 10th, 2010, 20:05 | 只看该作者 #254 | |
Free to Air Installer
|
引用:
上面那个CASE是告的DIGITAL STORE,去年NFUSION最大的DISTIBUTOR。它家的4个店都在GTA,当然是安省法庭了。DIGI的老板估计这两年也赚了上千万,有的是钱打官司了。 VIEWSAT的老板判了1年半,但他估计这几年赚了几千万了。 |
|
|
Feb 10th, 2010, 21:19 | 只看该作者 #255 | |
Junior Member
注册日期: Jan 2010
帖子: 7
声望: 0
|
引用:
但这段说Ravin好像就是“Superstar”. 而且住在2901 Jane Street, Unit 91 难道Superstar是一群人? [11] The Plaintiffs have brought a contempt motion in which they allege, inter alia, that Ravin continues to engage in breaches of the Radiocommunication Act R.S.C. 1985, c.R-2, as am. by making posts on the web site www.dummychat.com (“Dummy Chat Web Site”) under the username “Superstar”. Superstar’s posts provide updates regarding the encrypted programming of the Plaintiffs, provide support for decrypting the Plaintiffs’ programming, and post so-called piracy files. [12] The Plaintiffs attempted to execute the first Anton Piller Order March 30, 2009. They encountered difficulty at the residence of Ravin, being 2901 Jane Street, Unit 91, Toronto and at the Digital Store at Futurity Gate, Unit 7, Vaughan, Ontario. The evidence indicates that as of March 26, 2009, the Digital Store Web Site was owned, operated and/or promoted by Ravin. [13] Ravin reportedly was at home March 30, 2009 but would not come to the door despite persistent knocking and he could not be served other than by email at 11:26 a.m. On March 31, 2009 about 7:30 a.m. the Order was personally served on Ravin and explained to him by the Independent Supervising Solicitor. Ravin was asked to provide his Acer Laptop computer but he did not deliver it until April 1, 2009. [14] Thousands of files were deleted from this computer between March 30 and April 1, 2009.The Acer Laptop was imaged about April 2, 2009 pursuant to the first Anton Piller Order and found to contain five fragments of deleted files indicating access to the Dummy Chat Web Site by Superstar on at least five occasions. The fragments indicated that a user named “Superstar” accessed private messages on the Dummy Chat Web Site and that approximately 600 private messages were available. |
|
|