返回   华枫论坛 > ◆生活板块◆ > 生活百事



发表新主题 回复
 
只看楼主 主题工具
旧 Nov 25th, 2012, 10:46     #1
haigez
Member
级别:3 | 在线时长:26小时 | 升级还需:6小时级别:3 | 在线时长:26小时 | 升级还需:6小时级别:3 | 在线时长:26小时 | 升级还需:6小时
 
注册日期: Oct 2009
帖子: 97
haigez is an unknown quantity at this point
默认 温家宝不雅视屏第一季

纽约时报再揭温家宝平安洗钱路线图

newyork timeshttp://t.itc.cn/t9TRM



Lobbying, a Windfall and a Leader’s Family

Published: November 24, 2012 18 Comments




(Page 6 of 6)

For instance, the rules barred party officials in charge of a state-owned company from using their parents, children — or even their children’s spouse’s relatives — to trade stocks of a listed state-owned company.






GraphicPing An’s Hidden Shareholders: Friends and Family of Wen Jiabao













Related


Another Big Stake in Ping An, Hidden in a Hong Kong Investment(November 25, 2012)
Billions in Hidden Riches for Family of Chinese Leader(October 26, 2012)
Readers’ Comments

Share your thoughts.


Post a Comment »
Read All Comments (18) »
The Times found no indication that Mr. Wen shared inside information with family members.

But there are many unanswered questions about the relatives’ holdings, analysts consulted by The Times said, like who might have known about the relatives’ purchases and whether anyone had a legal obligation to disclose that information.

Executives at Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs say they were unaware of the share purchases and were not involved in the transactions.

The companies also said that a typical I.P.O. process is unlikely to uncover the ultimate identity of shareholders who are hiding behind layers of investment vehicles using unrecognizable names.

According to regulations in Hong Kong and China, publicly listed companies and their professional partners who help sell shares to the public are legally obligated to disclose the identities of only those shareholders controlling a stake larger than 5 percent. The Times found that at its peak, Taihong, the investment vehicle tied to the Wen family, never held more than a 3.2 percent stake.

Another question that remains unanswered is how Taihong was able to buy shares of Ping An at a price that appears to have been highly discounted. By late 2002, Ping An had already become a hot I.P.O. prospect following a big investment by HSBC.

The answers to some of the questions, legal experts say, may turn on who was involved in brokering the deal that led to the relatives’ acquiring shares in Ping An in the period before the company’s public offering in 2004, and whether the deal-makers were seeking to gain favors from the regulators.

“The key questions are: why were these people chosen, and on what terms did they get the shares?” said Jerome A. Cohen, a professor at New York University Law School and an expert on China’s legal system. “Obviously, everyone would like to get in before a hot I.P.O.”



« Previous Page

1
2
3
4
5
6

A version of this article appeared in print on November 25, 2012, on page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: Lobbying, a Windfall and a Leader’s Family.◇×
haigez 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
发表新主题 回复


发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以发表回复
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑自己的帖子

启用 BB 代码
论坛启用 表情符号
论坛启用 [IMG] 代码
论坛禁用 HTML 代码



所有时间均为格林尼治时间 -4。现在的时间是 10:40

请尊重文章原创者,转帖请注明来源及原作者。
凡是本站用户自行发布的任何信息,皆不代表本站的立场,
华枫网站不确保各类信息的正确性和可靠性,也不承担由此而导致的任何直接或间接损失以及任何法律责任。

Copyright © 1999-2024 Chinasmile