返回   华枫论坛 > ◆生活板块◆ > 法律园地



发表新主题 回复
 
只看楼主 主题工具
旧 Dec 29th, 2009, 14:20     #1
hed
Member
级别:1 | 在线时长:5小时 | 升级还需:7小时
 
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 33
hed is on a distinguished road
默认 离婚双方各带一个孩子, 抚养费问题

离婚双方各带一个孩子,一方一次性支付另一方一定数目现金后,同意互不支付子女抚养费,这样的协议离婚以后会不会有麻烦,比如追要抚养费等?多谢!
hed 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
旧 Dec 29th, 2009, 15:04   只看该作者   #2
snowman2009
小菜
级别:3 | 在线时长:21小时 | 升级还需:11小时级别:3 | 在线时长:21小时 | 升级还需:11小时级别:3 | 在线时长:21小时 | 升级还需:11小时
 
注册日期: Mar 2009
帖子: 74
声望: 250113
snowman2009 has a reputation beyond reputesnowman2009 has a reputation beyond reputesnowman2009 has a reputation beyond reputesnowman2009 has a reputation beyond reputesnowman2009 has a reputation beyond reputesnowman2009 has a reputation beyond reputesnowman2009 has a reputation beyond reputesnowman2009 has a reputation beyond reputesnowman2009 has a reputation beyond reputesnowman2009 has a reputation beyond reputesnowman2009 has a reputation beyond repute
默认

离婚干啥?好玩?
离婚是最愚蠢的,

帅哥 snowman2009 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
旧 Dec 29th, 2009, 18:11   只看该作者   #3
honeynut
Senior Member
级别:31 | 在线时长:1090小时 | 升级还需:62小时级别:31 | 在线时长:1090小时 | 升级还需:62小时级别:31 | 在线时长:1090小时 | 升级还需:62小时
 
注册日期: Jul 2005
帖子: 1,038
声望: 34861
honeynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond repute
默认

去律师那里公证签字,一般来说以后就没有麻烦了。为啥“一般来说”,是因为协议是按现在的状况签订的,如果有一方的经济状况发生了重大变化时,另一方就有权多索取小孩(仅限于未成年子女,不包括配偶)的抚养费。比如几年前那个中了3000万super7的离婚多年的穷光蛋,就要每年多给两个子女30万。
honeynut 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
旧 Dec 29th, 2009, 20:03   只看该作者   #4
ElephantSong
Senior Member
级别:34 | 在线时长:1313小时 | 升级还需:52小时级别:34 | 在线时长:1313小时 | 升级还需:52小时级别:34 | 在线时长:1313小时 | 升级还需:52小时级别:34 | 在线时长:1313小时 | 升级还需:52小时级别:34 | 在线时长:1313小时 | 升级还需:52小时级别:34 | 在线时长:1313小时 | 升级还需:52小时
 
ElephantSong 的头像
 
注册日期: Apr 2005
住址: Toronto
帖子: 3,625
声望: 2225336
ElephantSong has a reputation beyond reputeElephantSong has a reputation beyond reputeElephantSong has a reputation beyond reputeElephantSong has a reputation beyond reputeElephantSong has a reputation beyond reputeElephantSong has a reputation beyond reputeElephantSong has a reputation beyond reputeElephantSong has a reputation beyond reputeElephantSong has a reputation beyond reputeElephantSong has a reputation beyond reputeElephantSong has a reputation beyond repute
发送 MSN 消息给 ElephantSong
默认

只要发达了,多给孩子几个钱算什么,就怕发达不了.
ElephantSong 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
旧 Dec 29th, 2009, 22:11   只看该作者   #5
honeynut
Senior Member
级别:31 | 在线时长:1090小时 | 升级还需:62小时级别:31 | 在线时长:1090小时 | 升级还需:62小时级别:31 | 在线时长:1090小时 | 升级还需:62小时
 
注册日期: Jul 2005
帖子: 1,038
声望: 34861
honeynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond repute
默认

引用:
作者: ElephantSong 查看帖子
只要发达了,多给孩子几个钱算什么,就怕发达不了.
人和人不同,那个拿了3000万的就是不肯出一分钱给分别了很多年的小孩,所以才让我们局外人听说了这么个法律条文。
honeynut 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
旧 Jan 4th, 2010, 16:56   只看该作者   #6
hed
Member
级别:1 | 在线时长:5小时 | 升级还需:7小时
 
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 33
声望: 10
hed is on a distinguished road
默认

难道离婚后,政府或者法院还要定期通报双方的收入情况不成?
hed 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
旧 Jan 4th, 2010, 17:14   只看该作者   #7
WENT
Senior Member
级别:28 | 在线时长:935小时 | 升级还需:22小时级别:28 | 在线时长:935小时 | 升级还需:22小时级别:28 | 在线时长:935小时 | 升级还需:22小时级别:28 | 在线时长:935小时 | 升级还需:22小时
 
注册日期: May 2008
帖子: 967
声望: 102232
WENT has a reputation beyond reputeWENT has a reputation beyond reputeWENT has a reputation beyond reputeWENT has a reputation beyond reputeWENT has a reputation beyond reputeWENT has a reputation beyond reputeWENT has a reputation beyond reputeWENT has a reputation beyond reputeWENT has a reputation beyond reputeWENT has a reputation beyond reputeWENT has a reputation beyond repute
默认

引用:
作者: hed 查看帖子
难道离婚后,政府或者法院还要定期通报双方的收入情况不成?
应该不会。除非一方认为被骗,或吃亏了而上庭打官司,法院就会可能要求通报双方的收入情况。
WENT 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
旧 Jan 5th, 2010, 17:49   只看该作者   #8
honeynut
Senior Member
级别:31 | 在线时长:1090小时 | 升级还需:62小时级别:31 | 在线时长:1090小时 | 升级还需:62小时级别:31 | 在线时长:1090小时 | 升级还需:62小时
 
注册日期: Jul 2005
帖子: 1,038
声望: 34861
honeynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond reputehoneynut has a reputation beyond repute
默认

引用:
作者: hed 查看帖子
难道离婚后,政府或者法院还要定期通报双方的收入情况不成?
法律是认可这种私了协议的,不需要再定期通报。只是发了横财时(每年涨工资不算)尽量别让对方知道就行了,如果心眼好一点的话,中了乐透主动分给另一个孩子一些,这边不比中国,这里中了大奖要昭告天下的,瞒是瞒不住的。
honeynut 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
发表新主题 回复

主题工具

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以发表回复
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑自己的帖子

启用 BB 代码
论坛启用 表情符号
论坛启用 [IMG] 代码
论坛禁用 HTML 代码



所有时间均为格林尼治时间 -4。现在的时间是 09:04

请尊重文章原创者,转帖请注明来源及原作者。
凡是本站用户自行发布的任何信息,皆不代表本站的立场,
华枫网站不确保各类信息的正确性和可靠性,也不承担由此而导致的任何直接或间接损失以及任何法律责任。

Copyright © 1999-2024 Chinasmile