返回   华枫论坛 > ◆生活板块◆ > 法律园地



发表新主题 回复
 
只看楼主 主题工具
旧 Aug 23rd, 2008, 03:23     #1
ericwu
Senior Member
级别:4 | 在线时长:32小时 | 升级还需:13小时级别:4 | 在线时长:32小时 | 升级还需:13小时级别:4 | 在线时长:32小时 | 升级还需:13小时级别:4 | 在线时长:32小时 | 升级还需:13小时
 
注册日期: Jan 2006
帖子: 117
ericwu has a reputation beyond reputeericwu has a reputation beyond reputeericwu has a reputation beyond reputeericwu has a reputation beyond reputeericwu has a reputation beyond reputeericwu has a reputation beyond reputeericwu has a reputation beyond reputeericwu has a reputation beyond reputeericwu has a reputation beyond reputeericwu has a reputation beyond reputeericwu has a reputation beyond repute
默认 【求助】寻找证人,为我女儿和太太找回公道 (一) (转)

寻找证人,为我女儿和太太找回公道 (一)

关于这个案件我十分感激广大网友的关心和支持,今天我收到许多电话,也看到许多网友的来贴,让我感动万分。在这个案件中我太太的证词因为没有证人证实,而对其中一位开车跟在被告后面的证人因其停车时也越过人行斑马线,就认为被告也是没有足够时间刹车,以此作为主要依据得出上述判决,我认为很不公平,为什么其余所有证人包括坐在她付驾驶座上的男友都在远处看到身着鲜艳衣服的我女儿和太太,而只有被告在撞人前才看到,而被告车道前面没有任何视线障碍,不像有的网友以为视线被停在斑马线之前的车挡住,因为被告在最靠近我太太和女儿的那条车道curb line上,这难道不是 careless driving 吗? 检察官对此也认为这是careless driving的最有利的证据。

我现将法官列出我太太的证词没有证人证实的部分:

1.It has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that there were motor vehicles stopped for the pedestrians in the westbound left lane.
2.It has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that my wife was stopped for a period of time waiting for motor vehicles to stop prior to stepping onto the roadway and entering the crosswalk.
3.A driver or possible drivers of vehicles at , close to , or approaching the scene of the accident left the scene without leaving their names or giving statements. It has not been proven where those vehicles were when the accident occurred.

请广大网友问问周围是否有朋友在当时正好看到车祸发生,任何细节尤其是上述3点的情况都可能对案件起到关键作用。

我的email 是 changweiye@yahoo.com
电话是403-383-1798 再次表示感谢。


















http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/...f-ac1bcd840315

Woman acquitted of charges in car accident that killed a 6-year-old
Daryl Slade, Calgary Herald
Published: Monday, August 18, 2008
CALGARY - A University of Calgary student was acquitted Monday of all three charges related to a car-pedestrian accident that killed a six-year-old girl in January 2007.

Provincial court Judge Catherine Skene, in a written ruling, found Angela Ta, 19, not guilty of careless driving, failing to yield to a pedestrian in a crosswalk and passing a vehicle stopped for a pedestrian in a crosswalk related to the crash that killed Jenna Chang and injured the girl's mother, Ye Qiao.

"It's just very sad . . . very tough," Wei Chang, the girl's father, said outside court following provincial court Judge Catherine Skene. "This case, justice is not served. I don't know how to tell my wife."





The judge wrote that Ta could not have stopped her father's black BMW in time before it struck Chang and Qiao att 32nd Ave. and 37th St. N.W. on Jan. 18, 2007.

"Based on the evidence and testimony that I did have before me," wrote Skene, "there is evidence to suggest that the two pedestrians stepped off the sidewalk and/or curb, onto the roadway - specifically westbound 32nd Avenue into the path of Ta's vehicle when Ta's vehicle was so close that it was impracticable for the driver to yield the right of way."


the judge said no guilty,cause:
1.It has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that there were motor vehicles stopped for the pedestrians in the westbound left lane.
2.It has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that my wife was stopped for a period of time waiting for motor vehicles to stop prior to stepping onto the roadway and entering the crosswalk.
3.A driver or possible drivers of vehicles at , close to , or approaching the scene of the accident left the scene without leaving their names or giving statements. It has not been proven where those vehicles were when the accident occurred.
ericwu 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
旧 Aug 23rd, 2008, 12:52   只看该作者   #2
笑熬漿糊
级别:79 | 在线时长:6716小时 | 升级还需:4小时级别:79 | 在线时长:6716小时 | 升级还需:4小时级别:79 | 在线时长:6716小时 | 升级还需:4小时级别:79 | 在线时长:6716小时 | 升级还需:4小时级别:79 | 在线时长:6716小时 | 升级还需:4小时级别:79 | 在线时长:6716小时 | 升级还需:4小时级别:79 | 在线时长:6716小时 | 升级还需:4小时
 
笑熬漿糊 的头像
 
注册日期: Nov 2005
住址: Edmonton
帖子: 33,333
积分:36
精华:10
声望: 146144934
笑熬漿糊 has a reputation beyond repute笑熬漿糊 has a reputation beyond repute笑熬漿糊 has a reputation beyond repute笑熬漿糊 has a reputation beyond repute笑熬漿糊 has a reputation beyond repute笑熬漿糊 has a reputation beyond repute笑熬漿糊 has a reputation beyond repute笑熬漿糊 has a reputation beyond repute笑熬漿糊 has a reputation beyond repute笑熬漿糊 has a reputation beyond repute笑熬漿糊 has a reputation beyond repute
默认

现在再找证人有点虚假的感觉。

这种案子在这里庭外和解的可能性很大,法官那么判,几乎可以说得到了双方的首肯。

个人看法。

擎傲世之龍碼 從混沌中明清澈
笑熬漿糊 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
旧 Aug 23rd, 2008, 19:50   只看该作者   #3
chang25
Senior Member
级别:6 | 在线时长:72小时 | 升级还需:5小时级别:6 | 在线时长:72小时 | 升级还需:5小时
 
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 152
声望: 0
chang25 is an unknown quantity at this point
默认

引用:
作者: 飞龙 查看帖子
现在再找证人有点虚假的感觉。

这种案子在这里庭外和解的可能性很大,法官那么判,几乎可以说得到了双方的首肯。

个人看法。
因为谁也没想到法官会认为证据不足而取消指控,现在还有一个月的上述期,如果找到新证据,会对我们很有利,虽然有困难,但我们还是要是要try。请问双方是指保险方和检察官吗?何以见得?
chang25 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
发表新主题 回复

主题工具

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以发表回复
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑自己的帖子

启用 BB 代码
论坛启用 表情符号
论坛启用 [IMG] 代码
论坛禁用 HTML 代码



所有时间均为格林尼治时间 -4。现在的时间是 04:29

请尊重文章原创者,转帖请注明来源及原作者。
凡是本站用户自行发布的任何信息,皆不代表本站的立场,
华枫网站不确保各类信息的正确性和可靠性,也不承担由此而导致的任何直接或间接损失以及任何法律责任。

Copyright © 1999-2024 Chinasmile