Jun 1st, 2007, 21:21 | #1 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Aug 2006
帖子: 521
|
西医这么科学,为什么黄菊还会死?
rt
|
|
Jun 3rd, 2007, 20:38 | 只看该作者 #14 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 747
声望: 1941528
|
You once concluded: 根据“科学(Science)”的定义,中医是不折不扣地科学 http://www.chinasmile.net/forums/sho...d.php?t=176677 |
|
Jun 3rd, 2007, 21:48 | 只看该作者 #15 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Aug 2006
帖子: 521
声望: 872
|
引用:
why would Huang Ju die of Xi Yi? |
|
|
Jun 4th, 2007, 08:12 | 只看该作者 #16 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 747
声望: 1941528
|
Because XiYi is just better than ZhongYi and it never claimed that it could cure any cancer. However you can find many many claims that ZhongYi can cure cancer. One may ask: 1.why would not Huang seek for ZhongYi's treatment? He could if he liked to do that. 2. Why is there not any Zhong Yi prcationer willing to show up in front of Huang and saying: what XiYi cannot deal, I can and let me take over the treatments?
|
|
Jun 4th, 2007, 21:20 | 只看该作者 #20 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 747
声望: 1941528
|
Let us go a little bit further with your argument. (1) Zhong Yi was the worst, because before XiYi was introduced in China (say for example, at the year of 1500), only Zhong Yi was available to provide the treatment. And the people living at the year of 1500 were all dead. So ZhongYi was totally useless. (2)There is no risk to claim that everyone (including you and me) can cure the cancer, as long as (for example) you and I only take those patients that have been close to death (那些被西医,中医治得奄奄一息...). |
|