Jun 26th, 2007, 22:58 | #1 |
华疯小混混的领导
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 18,324
积分:58
精华:15
|
这个搭配怎么样
如果去美国配一套机身+镜头,初步打算选CANON: 在BEACH 上的报价: EOS Digital Rebel XT Body (Black) - EOS 350D $494 50MM F1.8/ II $78 17-40MM F/4 L USM $568 70-200MM F/4 L IS USM $924 全下来2064USD. 正考虑是选IS 还是普通XXB. 如果选普通XXB可以省400块.IS 值这400块吗? |
一天想到归去但已晚
|
|
|
Jun 26th, 2007, 23:19 | 只看该作者 #2 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jul 2004
住址: 木桥镇
帖子: 5,802
积分:104
精华:23
声望: 28422402
|
这个搭配从价钱/像质看,挺好 从使用方便性看,不大好,在外经常需要换镜头。 我用的就是这样三件,但是普通小小白。就是觉得不太方便。 我曾经添过一支tamron 28-75mm,有了那个头,其他头就用得很少了 但后来又嫌tamron色彩偏黄,就卖了。 后来很少需要用xxb,几乎只用痰盂头,倒也就无所谓了。 所以根据你的拍照重点考虑,不必焦段齐全。 如果没重点,一般人还是覆盖完广角到300。 xxb is 是目前canon像质最优异的变焦头,相质比xb is 还好 普通xxb长焦端相质不佳,200mm附近,甚至不如 70-300/f4-5.6 is |
|
Jun 27th, 2007, 00:21 | 只看该作者 #6 |
团结紧张严肃活泼
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 10,203
积分:43
精华:12
声望: 48918081
|
野猪, 我觉得你这样配还是不错的,虽然说如果一次带三个头,换来换去是挺麻烦的,但如果你有潜力度过漫长的磨合期,进入火红的更年期的话,你每次出门最多带两个头,实际用一个头。 另外,我本来很推荐别人买个50/1.8,因为不贵,成像也不错,还能YY自己如大师般只用一只标头怎样怎样。但后来我的想法变了,如果你有17-40/f4 L和XXB IS,这个标头慢慢就变成鸡肋了,出门以前经常考虑带还是不带,如果不买,索性也不会烦恼了。 |
|
Jun 27th, 2007, 00:39 | 只看该作者 #8 |
华枫管理员
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 27,175
声望: 5781998
|
|
http://i42.tinypic.com/eqdv2x.gif http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/1...1123801530.gif 做爱做的事,交配交的人.穿别人的鞋,走自己的路,让他们找去吧! |
|
|
Jun 27th, 2007, 23:58 | 只看该作者 #18 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 203
声望: 0
|
引用:
楼主要考虑: 可能还要配B+WUV镜两块和偏振镜两块, 这可要不少钱, 因为这两个镜头一个是67, 一个是77mm的, 另外既然都出400D了, 应该还是400D好。 IS是好像比小小白好一些, 但是, 我对XXB是非常非常的满意, 非常锐利, 色彩还原极好。 楼主购齐上面说的4块滤镜和升级到400D我看你的那400块钱差价已经快用完了。 偏振镜拍风景是非常有用的。 可能楼主至少要为自己的那个17-40准备一个77mm的B+W偏振。 The non-IS 70-200 f/4 is similarly sharp in the center over the mid and long portion of the focal length range, but the f/4 IS is sharper in the center through 85mm or so and is noticeably sharper in the corners over most of the focal length range. These two lenses are most similar at 200mm. These differences are reduced as the subject distance is increased (the non-IS lens performs more similarly to the IS lens). The f/4 IS and f/2.8 IS 70-200mm L lenses are similarly sharp at the same aperture and focal length settings. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L IS USM Lens images have great color and contrast. CA (Chromatic Aberration) is very well controlled. Mild barrel distortion is present at 70mm and mild pincushion is present at 200mm. The change from barrel to pincushion is gradual with 95mm being the approximate focal length of the crossover. Distortion is nearly identical between the two 70-200mm f/4 L lenses. The 70-200 f/4 IS controls flare very well - slightly better than non-IS f/4 and even more noticeably better than the f/2.8 IS. Vignetting is rather well controlled but Full Frame body users will notice darker corners beyond 135mm at f/4. The f/4 IS lens appears to have slightly less vignetting than the f/4 non-IS lens. |
|
|