为什么sacd这么贵？山寨不了吗？

[dalplex]

不谈版权问题。

就生产技术上说为什么没有出现山寨的呢？

[千金顶]

没利润，没动力。
不是真正的发烧友不会买这个，而真正的发烧友不会买山寨

[老广]

别说山寨了,就是3星,东芝这些牌子都没人买啦.

[dalplex]

我说的是sacd disc。


不是说播放机。

sa-cd的价格太离谱。

[silent_fish]

作者: dalpaul

我说的是sa------cd。


不是说播放机。

sa-cd的价格太离谱。

sacd一直没有真正热起来，最近的高档CD机已经能把cd的潜力挖掘出来，同样的录音，sacd未必占优

[我爱奔驰]

作者: 千金顶

没利润，没动力。
不是真正的发烧友不会买这个，而真正的发烧友不会买山寨

呵，回来了？以为你去南极考察。

[我爱奔驰]

作者: silent_fish

sacd一直没有真正热起来，最近的高档CD机已经能把cd的潜力挖掘出来，同样的录音，sacd未必占优

问题是SACD太不象话，不让Copy盗版，怎能流行起来？Sony Stupid。

[dalplex]

技术指标一直是争论的焦点。但是这不妨碍闷声发大财低成本地生产。

只要便宜就是不见得比cd好有什么关系呢？

消费者一看这么高的价钱自然不接受了。

前两天有个2手卡彭特的还25。原价要58。

试问有几个消费的起？

[dalplex]

现在已经后悔买79avi了。

几个破dvd-a听来听去也没听出个所以然。
sacd一个也没有。

留它何用呢？

[silent_fish]

作者: 我爱奔驰

问题是SACD太不象话，不让Copy盗版，怎能流行起来？Sony Stupid。

http://www.soundstage.com/revequip/a...ch_cd3mkii.htm
It is with a heavy heart that I acknowledge SACD's and DVD-A's slow, steady decline -- I hope not into oblivion. Both were launched with such high hopes and high expectations. Both have garnered numerous wildly positive reviews, and SACD seems to have gathered momentum with audiophiles, especially now that some SACD players offer very good -- even great -- CD playback.

The issue, however, is Sony's apparent abandonment of SACD, leaving labels like Telarc, Mobile Fidelity, Fantasy Jazz, Chandos, Hyperion, Harmonia Mundi, Naxos and others to carry on

...

The answer to this question is a resounding "yes!," but there are some differences. The CD3 Mk II and X-01 offer a matter-of-fact,
Which would I choose? I don't prefer one over the other, and I could be very happy with either. If I had only CDs to play, however, the choice would be clear and based solely on cost. Is SACD playback alone worth $7500 to you?

[千金顶]

作者: 我爱奔驰

呵，回来了？以为你去南极考察。

回去感受了一下国内人们生活在水深火热，一天赶3个酒场，每顿都不下半斤白酒，感觉把3年的酒债都还了。

[老广]

作者: dalpaul

我说的是sacd disc。


不是说播放机。

sa-cd的价格太离谱。

看你的题目就是说什么都行。
我买的觉得不贵，不到10刀一张都有，DSD母带录音的。有些跟CD实际上是一个价。
比较这一张, 我认为贵这一点是值得的：
CD: http://www.amazon.ca/gp/offer-listin...&condition=new
SACD:http://www.amazon.ca/gp/offer-listin...&condition=new