返回   华枫论坛 > ◆主题论坛◆ > 视听发烧站



发表新主题 回复
精华  
查看全部 主题工具
旧 Apr 28th, 2010, 01:35     #1
somedy
不堪盈手赠 还寝梦佳期
级别:31 | 在线时长:1120小时 | 升级还需:32小时级别:31 | 在线时长:1120小时 | 升级还需:32小时级别:31 | 在线时长:1120小时 | 升级还需:32小时
 
somedy 的头像
 
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 864
somedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond repute
默认

引用:
作者: gzkl 查看帖子
为什么A类放大器好?因为它的波形上下是不完全对称的(一边大小),而喇叭的振动两个方向也是不对称。所以这种不对称互补了,出来的声音就对称了。
这个专家的说法倒是独树一帜,电子线路课本告诉我,甲类放大器好,是因为没有交越失真,代价是没有输入信号的时候也要半功率工作,空载也耗电、工作温度高导致对器件要求也高,不过做耳放应当无妨。曾经自己焊过一只Meta42耳放,电池供电,效果不错;尝试过把它接到Class A方式,发现吃电池超快,可见课本没有骗人
somedy 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
旧 Apr 28th, 2010, 11:46     #2
somedy
不堪盈手赠 还寝梦佳期
级别:31 | 在线时长:1120小时 | 升级还需:32小时级别:31 | 在线时长:1120小时 | 升级还需:32小时级别:31 | 在线时长:1120小时 | 升级还需:32小时
 
somedy 的头像
 
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 864
声望: 794908
somedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond repute
默认

引用:
作者: Taotaoba 查看帖子
如果我没猜错的话,这个专家应该是Nelson Pass。我觉得他说得有一定道理,但到底是不是这个原因,我持怀疑态度。而且他所说的也不是把波形修正了变成完美的波形了,而是甲类单端的上下不对称特性正好和空气的单端特性相似,所以声音听起来会更自然。如果正是这样,那么当你把喇叭或耳机的正负极性互换时,听感应...
学习了。这样说来,选择器件的时候,线性范围大的管子也未必好喽?
somedy 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
旧 Apr 28th, 2010, 14:16     #3
somedy
不堪盈手赠 还寝梦佳期
级别:31 | 在线时长:1120小时 | 升级还需:32小时级别:31 | 在线时长:1120小时 | 升级还需:32小时级别:31 | 在线时长:1120小时 | 升级还需:32小时
 
somedy 的头像
 
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 864
声望: 794908
somedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond repute
默认

引用:
作者: Taotaoba 查看帖子
不是这个意思。管子当然线性范围越大越好。
这就不对啦,按我的理解,单端输出的不对称性应该是放大管的非线性造成的,管子线性越好,不对称越小 ...
somedy 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
旧 Apr 28th, 2010, 21:55     #4
somedy
不堪盈手赠 还寝梦佳期
级别:31 | 在线时长:1120小时 | 升级还需:32小时级别:31 | 在线时长:1120小时 | 升级还需:32小时级别:31 | 在线时长:1120小时 | 升级还需:32小时
 
somedy 的头像
 
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 864
声望: 794908
somedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond reputesomedy has a reputation beyond repute
默认

引用:
作者: Taotaoba 查看帖子
任何失真都是应该尽量去避免,高保真追求的是0失真。线性越好,失真就越小。
我的意思是根据Pass先生的理论,0失真的功放未必好,因为扬声器的失真跟甲类放大器的失真互补 ...
somedy 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
发表新主题 回复


发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以发表回复
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑自己的帖子

启用 BB 代码
论坛启用 表情符号
论坛启用 [IMG] 代码
论坛禁用 HTML 代码



所有时间均为格林尼治时间 -4。现在的时间是 00:52

请尊重文章原创者,转帖请注明来源及原作者。
凡是本站用户自行发布的任何信息,皆不代表本站的立场,
华枫网站不确保各类信息的正确性和可靠性,也不承担由此而导致的任何直接或间接损失以及任何法律责任。

Copyright © 1999-2024 Chinasmile