Mar 10th, 2011, 15:54 | 只看该作者 #43 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 3,058
积分:10
精华:2
声望: 26448748
|
楼上请放松,这里是谈论子女教育的,连轮子都扯出来了,这楼也歪的太远了吧。 我原本猜测楼主和他的孩子面对这样一份试题,情感上难以接受。处于同样的感受,我愿意和楼主一起,找出这个题目的根源。至于这是个人行为还是加拿大反华教育的特例,我和楼主存在分歧。但是就这件事情来说,我还是希望能够修正它。 楼主,题目的作者(不是活动的联系人)已经给我回复了。他表示不应该这样出题,而且在以后的题目里不会出现任何国家的名字。你要是愿意,请PM我你的邮箱地址,我可以把邮件的内容发给你。 |
|
共 3 位会员 感谢 小艺 发表的文章: |
Mar 10th, 2011, 17:21 | 只看该作者 #45 | |
Banned
注册日期: Apr 2005
帖子: 4,952
声望: 533137
|
引用:
就是有些中国人就不知道反政府和反华是2码事情.在加拿大所有人都反对过政府,难道加拿大人都对加拿大不好,不是的,是因为爱加拿大才这样,不但这样,加拿大人民还花钱养反对党,花钱选举推翻政府,如果有人认为这是反加拿大,这些人就太愚蠢了. 在中国,共产党也反对政府,共产党反华? 至于这个DJY-GS完全是反华,他就喜欢 中国人不要民主自由人权,这样人家怎么歧视中国人,中国人都不要说"不"字.就象当初毛泽东发动的祸国殃民的3年大跃进(3年灾害),饿死无数中国人民,中国人民不能说不好,就是害死无数中国人民还是 要伟大万睡的. |
|
|
Mar 10th, 2011, 17:30 | 只看该作者 #46 | |
Junior Member
注册日期: Feb 2011
帖子: 26
声望: 549747
|
引用:
能得到这个结果,我本人还是不太满意。 如果只得到出题者的“以后的题目里不会出现任何国家的名字”这个结果,还是不够的。我认为只是这个出题的人出来做这个“保证”,而忽视了组织者的责任,是典型的西式虚伪,太假了,假的如假球黑哨一样的假和黑。而且,此人今年做过了,“保证”了,第二年,换人了,他也做,再来个“保证”,问又将如何?这个事情还真不能就这样算了。如何做? 首先要再认识这个问题。这个事情发生在全DURHAM区的一次全区的中小学生的科技活动上,现场有上百的学生以及至少同样数量的家长。这些家长有的在现场都在指导孩子做题。因此,不仅仅是“加拿大的反华教育是从娃娃开始的”,而且加拿大的成年人也在时时地复习反华教育。 其次,再看看如何处理善后。既然这个活动是有组织者的,理应由组织者出面来澄清这个问题,并作出相应的“西式保证”(虽然知道是假的保证)。然后向全DURHAM区的华人公开道歉,即使是说谎,也要公开。 如何? |
|
|
感谢 认真写帖认真回帖 此篇文章之用户: |
annarosa (Apr 3rd, 2011) |
Mar 11th, 2011, 07:18 | 只看该作者 #50 | ||
Banned
注册日期: Dec 2007
帖子: 74
声望: 0
|
引用:
引用:
美国鬼子死光光,反华,反共死光光,娃哈哈哈。 |
||
|
Mar 11th, 2011, 17:00 | 只看该作者 #53 |
Junior Member
注册日期: Feb 2011
帖子: 26
声望: 549747
|
今天我重新考虑了这个事件。 我认为首先要将这个事件归为“歧视华人”的事件,而不是说只是一件个案或个人问题。我们不能太j娇惯这些人原谅这些人以至于我们将永远处于一种被忽视的地位,并迫使我们也熟悉这个地位。我们也得告诉这个组织者他们的做法存在“歧视华人”的行为。我想,加拿大是个号称“多元文化”的国家,这个“歧视华人”的事件是有悖与“多元文化”这个提法的。 将事情定性了,下面就是要行动了。具体的行动步骤: 1.到底谁是这个本次活动的组织者?得找到它。这个算术题是在此次活动中分发的,因此活动的组织者是知道这件事的。如果找不到,可以通过OSHAWA这个学校找。小艺做了一些工作了,如果小艺知道谁是组织者了,请提供。 2.与组织这个活动的人或机构联系,让其作出解释,并相应作出“西式保证”。也就是说不让这个事件再发生或不能随时随地发生。 3.向全DURHAM区的华人就此事道歉。 4.学学西式的最后通牒法,限期组织者在5个工作日答复。如果组织者不愿意满足这些基本要求,将采取下一步的行动。 如果有人能有更好的主意,请建议。 上述内容需修改后写成一封邮件,我还真不知道用鸟语如何写。请通鸟语之人提供。 |
|
Mar 11th, 2011, 20:42 | 只看该作者 #54 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 3,058
积分:10
精华:2
声望: 26448748
|
引用:
我写信追问这件事的唯一目的,是告诉当事人这样做是错误的,引起了一部分人的不快,也是和加拿大的价值观不相符的。 以我的推测,组织这个活动的主要团体是:Professional Engineers of Ontario Lake Ontario Chapter,因为网站上的联系人和这些题目的作者都是这个组织的成员(可以在网站上找到他们的名字和联系方式)。如果你想采取进一步的行动,这是你的权利,我能做的就是把我知道的告诉你。 此帖于 Mar 11th, 2011 22:10 被 小艺 编辑。 |
|
|
感谢 小艺 此篇文章之用户: |
认真写帖认真回帖 (Mar 12th, 2011) |
Mar 11th, 2011, 22:19 | 只看该作者 #56 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Jul 2004
帖子: 3,058
积分:10
精华:2
声望: 26448748
|
一下是通信内容,对于隐私内容做了修改,楼主如果需要,我可以发原文给你。 No problem you can send it forward. ________________________________________ From: "Z, J" To: Chester S <skomra@*****.com> Cc: dvanee@*****.com Sent: Thu, March 10, 2011 3: 33 :26 PM Subject: RE: Durham Popsicle Stick Bridge Dear Chester, Thank you for your reply. I am happy to hear that you’ve decided to remove the country name in the future. It makes the question even shorter, doesn’t it. I’d like to send a copy forward to my friend if you don’t mind. I believe this will make his son feel comfortable. Thanks for Derek’s help too. J Z P\A ******* From: Chester S [mailto:skomra@*****.com] Sent: March 10, 2011 2:35 PM To: Z, J Subject: Durham Popsicle Stick Bridge Dear Mr. J Z: In regards to the Letter sent to Derek V E at the bottom: I am the writer of the question. I chose numbers which were easy to work with and do not require a calculator. 10% of a number is similar to dividing by 10. I also wanted to keep the question short. I should not have picked a country at all. I will change the wording for the future to avoid any country. If you have any further questions feel free to email me or call me at 905-***-**53. Chester S**** ================================ Dear Derek V E: The attached is a photo of the paper that handed out to all the registrants of Durham Popsicle Stick Bridge 2011 competition. My friend, a father of a young boy, took this photo and sent to me. He told me that his son was upset after reading the 2nd subject and asked him why Chinese cannot always produce good products. He felt hardly to response because he had no idea whether the subject was base on a truth or not. The subject #2 says: 10% of computer screens coming from China are defective. If 200 screens are ordered then how many will work properly? I have the same question now. Can you or anyone else can prove me this information? I mean, 10% of computer screens coming from China are defective? My friend and I will very appreciate for your help that may encourage a young fellow to face a TRUTH! I looking forward to hearing from you! <<DSCN2348.jpg>> Best Regards, |
|
感谢 小艺 此篇文章之用户: |
多伦多市政府 (Mar 11th, 2011) |
Mar 12th, 2011, 00:32 | 只看该作者 #57 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Oct 2008
帖子: 386
声望: 497336
|
谢谢小艺的行动。
引用:
这是我替楼主写给组织者的英文信,请大家完善,再由LZ发出 Dear Mr. Derek Van Ee, This is to express my grievance as a parent of a Canadian Chinese youth. He competed in the 6th Durham Popsicle Stick Bridge 2011 Competition, and was totally confused and gravely upset by a problem which says “10% of computer screens coming from China are defective. If 200 screen are ordered, then how many will work properly?” I was appalled and disturbed when he showed me the problem and when he asked me why China, the place where I came from more than 10 years ago, produces so many defective products. Recently an email has been sent from the writer of the problem that there is no factual base of the problem in question. To remedy the damage done to the pride of all Canadian Chinese competitors and their parents, I, therefore, formally request that the following be done immediately for the benefits of all parties concerned in this regrettable situation: 1. The organizers, Professional Engineers of Ontario Lake Ontario Chapter ; Ontario Association of Certified Engineering Technicians ;Technologists Durham Chapter, issue a letter of apology JOINTLY to all the Canadian Chinese competitors regarding the nonfactual statement, promising not to pick China, or any other country as a victim in the similar non factual and insensible situation. 2. The organizers issue a letter of clarification to all the other competitors and their parents to correct the impression left to them because of the nonfactual problem in question. I understand that a great many students from Grade 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 in Durham took part in the competition and therefore read the problem in question. 3. The organizers assume the responsibilities and make sure that no similar misleading statement is allowed in any public event within their realm in the future; as it is a disgrace to see such biased and misleading statement in mutual understanding and mutual tolerant multi-cultured Canadian society in 2011! I thank you very much for your time and effort regarding my grievance. I reserve all my civil rights to further pursue the case to a satisfactory closure. Sincerely, XXX (Signature) |
|
|
感谢 456789 此篇文章之用户: |
认真写帖认真回帖 (Mar 12th, 2011) |
Mar 12th, 2011, 02:06 | 只看该作者 #59 | |
Junior Member
注册日期: Feb 2011
帖子: 26
声望: 549747
|
引用:
既然中国没有涉及到10%的显示器次频率,就有必要追究责任了。看看这个作者写的回信,可以看出,他只是”换了个措辞以避免出现国家名字",没有一句抱歉的话,这个,不能接受,也不能容忍。 西式教育中对中国的歧视与偏见太深也太久了。得阻止它。 感谢你做的工作。 |
|
|