Jun 2nd, 2023, 10:55 | #1 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Dec 2018
帖子: 1,485
|
估计他当时就被逮捕了,而警察第二天就出来说没有偷。觉得挺草率的。 个人觉得作为一个生意人不应该无缘无故的去杀人,只要有证据就不怕,至少联邦法院不会亮剑。 |
|
Jun 9th, 2023, 10:32 | #2 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Dec 2018
帖子: 1,485
声望: 159
|
|
|
Jun 9th, 2023, 12:47 | #3 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Dec 2018
帖子: 1,485
声望: 159
|
引用:
美国的警察,双标得厉害。老周杀一个人,马上就抓起来了。 这个白大妈在家门口杀一个人,居然警察不管。你在家门口杀一条狗,警察肯定上门。杀一个人警察认为这都不是一个事。这么多人抗议才抓。抓了肯定也是无罪。这令人深思。 大家说这是观点还是描述? |
|
|
Jun 9th, 2023, 13:47 | #4 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Dec 2018
帖子: 1,485
声望: 159
|
引用:
业余的粉红和专业的五毛确有差距! The sheriff’s office delayed arresting Lorincz because of her claims of shooting because she felt in “mortal danger,” which is in line with Florida’s Stand Your Ground laws. However, when Lorincz told deputies in the second interview that Owens’ actions were not “reasonable or prudent,” deputies asked why Lorincz used those specific words. That’s when Lorincz admitted to researching self-defense laws as recently as the day of the interview, and “possibly” researching stand-your-ground laws in the past. Deputies also said Lorincz’s timeline of events contradicted the timeline of calls to 911 |
|
|
感谢 sofunny 此篇文章之用户: |
Chinaian (Jun 9th, 2023) |
Jun 9th, 2023, 14:03 | #5 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Dec 2018
帖子: 1,485
声望: 159
|
|
|
Jun 9th, 2023, 14:26 | #6 | |
Senior Member
注册日期: Dec 2018
帖子: 1,485
声望: 159
|
引用:
那位RickChow可不是第一次开枪了, 前次也打伤了人, 但是是自卫所以没有被捕,这次还莫有证据是自卫,而且是背后开枪, 被抓了应该。 这两案本来就没有可比性! 按你的说法, 李伟光是他妈的人上人, 都挖心来吃了, 也没坐牢。 我想说的是法律是人订的, 当然有缺陷, 有漏洞, 有人会利用这些漏洞逃脱法律的制裁, 就像辛普森一样, 但是这不是这个系统本身的意愿, 我们可以抱怨, 可以反对, 但不要用虚假的夸大的甚至错误的陈诉来表达。 |
|
|
Jun 9th, 2023, 14:34 | #7 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Dec 2018
帖子: 1,485
声望: 159
|
|
|
Jun 9th, 2023, 15:02 | #8 |
Senior Member
注册日期: Dec 2018
帖子: 1,485
声望: 159
|
|
|